Skip to main content

Full text of "Biology and migratory behavior of Agraulis vanillae (L.) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae)"

See other formats


BIOLOGY  AND  MIGRATORY  BEHAVIOR 
OY  AGRAULIS  VANILLAE    (L.) 
(LEPIDOPTERA,    NYMPHALIDAE) 


By 
RICHARD  TERRANCE  ARBOGAST 


A  DISSERTATION  PRESENTED  TO  THE  GRADUATE  COUNQL  OF 

THE   UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 

IN  PARTIAL  FULFILLMENT  OF  THE  REQUIREMENTS  FOR  THE 

DEGREE  OF  DOCTOR  OF   PHILOSOPHY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 
August,  1965 


430 

AGRI- 
CULTURAL 
LIBRA''" 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 


3  1262  08552  2612 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  writer  wishes  to  express  his  thanks  to  the  numerous 
persons  who  contributed  their  assistance  and  suggestions  during 
the  course  of  his  graduate  study. 

Special  thanks  are  due  Dr.  T,  J.  Walker,  who  first 
aroused  the  author's  interest  in  insect  migration  and  who  served 
as  Chairman  of  the  Supervisory  Committee.   His  encouragement  and 
many  suggestions  during  the  conduction  of  the  research  and  prep- 
aration of  the  manuscript  were  invaluable  contributions. 

Much  appreciation  is  also  expressed  to  Dr.  L.  A.  Hetrick, 
Dr.  D.  B.  Ward,  Dr.  D.  H.  Habeck,  and  Dr.  E.  G.  F.  Sauer  who 
served  as  members  of  the  Supervisory  Committee,  and  to  Dr.  C.  D. 
Monk  who  was  originally  a  member  of  the  committee. 

Thanks  also  go  to  Dr.  J.  T.  Creighton,  former  Head  of 
the  Department  of  Entomology,  for  his  assistance  during  the  course 
of  the  author's  graduate  work  and  to  Mr.  J.  P.  Ahrano  for  permis- 
sion to  use  the  field  in  which  observations  of  the  migration  were 
made . 

Finally,  the  writer  would  like  to  express  his  appreciation 
to  his  wife  for  her  patience  during  his  years  of  graduate  study 
and  for  her   ssistance  in  the  preparation  of  this  manuscript. 


IX 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Page 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii 

LIST  OF  TABLES ^ 

LIST  OF  FIGURES ^^ 

INTRODUCTION j^ 

LIFE  HISTORY 5 

Methods  and  Materials 5 

Rate  of  development 5 

Longevity  of  the  adults 7 

Reproductive  development  of  the  female  7 

Behavior  of  adults  and  larvae 8 

The  Egg  and  Oviposition g 

The  Larva ^^0 

The  Pupa 2.7 

The  Adult 2.7 

Emergence 2.7 

Sex  ratio 22 

Reproductive  development  of  the  female  22 

Mating  behavior 22 

Longevity, of  the  adults 25 

DISTRIBUTION  OF  LARVAL  FOOD  PLAiNTS 26 

POPULATIONS  OF  Agraulis  vanillae  IN  THE  VICINITY  OF 

GAINESVILLE,  FLORIDA  27 

Description  of  Observed  Breeding  Areas  27 

Fluctuations  in  the  Observed  Populations  29 

THE  FALL  MIGRATION 36 

Methods  and  Materials 35 

Observational  setup 35 

Weather  observations  36 

Speed  and  direction  of  flight 40 

Density  of  the  migration 44 

Reproductive  maturity  of  the  females  and  sex  ratio  45 

Description  of  the  Migration 46 

Characteristics  of  the  migratory  flight 46 

Variations  in  migration  density 50 

Reproductive  maturity  of  the  females  and  sex  ratio  54 


111 


Page 

ORIENTATION  EXPERIMENTS 58 

Introduction  58 

Methods  and  Materials 59 

Results 66 

DISCUSSION   AND   CONCLUSIONS •  84 

SUMMARY 91 

LITERATURE  CITED  93 

BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH 97 


IV 


LIST  OF  TABLES 
Table  Page 

1.  Observed  Number  of  Eggs  and  Larvae  in  Area  1 
(1964-65) 30 

2.  Observed  Number  of  Eggs  and  Larvae  in  Area  2 
(1964-65) 31 

3.  Observed  Number  of  Eggs  and  Larvae  in  Area  3 
(1964-65) 32 

4.  Observed  Number  of  Eggs  and  Larvae  in  Area  4 
(1964-65) 33 

5.  Density  of  Migration  and  Weather  Observed  1300- 

1400  EST  (1964) 55 

6.  Time  of  Beginning  of  Migration  on  Various  Days  .  .     56 

7.  Migration  Densities  Observed  at  Various  Times  on 
September  23,  1964 56 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 

Figure  Page 

1.  Fourth  ins  tars  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior 

Michener 11 

2.  Fifth  instar  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior  Michener.   12 

3.  Feeding  rhythms  of  fifth  ins  tars 15 

4.  Duration  of  the  various  instars  at  23-24°  C.  (left) 
and  at  28.5-29.5°  C.  (right) 16 

5.  Dorsal  view  of  pupa  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior 
Michener 18 

6.  Lateral  view  of  pupa  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior 
Michener 19 

7.  Duration  of  pupa  at  23-24°  C 20 

8.  Duration  of  pupa  at  28.5-29.5°  C 20 

9.  Time  of  emergence  of  the  adult 21 

10.  Recently  emerged  adult  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior 
Michener  hanging  from  the  pupal  skin 23 

11.  Breeding  areas  in  the  vicinity  of  Gainesville, 
Florida 28 

12.  Setup  for  observing  migrations 37 

13.  Wind  vane  and  anemometer  used  in  migration  studies.   38 

14.  Wind  speed  and  direction  dials  used  in  migration 
studies 39 

15.  Wind  vane  and  anemometer  mounted  on  tripod  for 
observations 41 

16.  Convention  used  in  measuring  angles  between  track 
and  wind  direction  (0)  and  between  track  and 

course  (0) 43 


VI 


Figure  Page 

17.  Tracks  of  migrants  observed  during  the  fall  of 

1963  (A)  and  1964  (B) 47 

18.  Tracks  of  migrants  observed  at  various  times  of  day 

on  September  23,  1964 48 

19.  Tracks  of  migrants  and  mean  wind  speed  and  direction 
observed  between  1300  and  1400  EST  on  various  days 

in  the  fall  of  1964 49 

20.  Ground  speed  of  migrants  flying  in  calm  air  ....   51 

21.  Ground  speed  of  migrants  flying  against  a  head  wind 
of  1-5  miles  per  hour  (A)  and  with  a  tail  wind  of 

1-4  miles  per  hour  (B) 52 

22.  Air  speed  of  migrants  flying  against  a  head  wind  of 
1-5  miles  per  hour  (A)  and  with  a  tail  wind  of  1-4 
miles  per  hour  (B) 53 

23.  Cage  used  for  orientation  tests 61 

24.  Cutaway  view  of  controlled  photoperiod  cabinet  used 

in  clock  resetting  experiments 65 

25.  Orientation  of  Individual  A  when  tested  between 
0930  and  1030  EST,  November  6,  1964,  without  reset- 
ting the  internal  clock 69 

26.  Orientation  of  Individual  A  when  tested  between 
1440  and  1540  EST,  November  6,  1964,  without  re- 
setting the  internal  clock 70 

27.  Orientation  of  Individual  B  when  tested  between 
0950  and  1050  EST,  October  30,  1964,  without  reset- 
ting the  internal  clock 71 

28.  Orientation  of  Individual  B  when  tested  between 
1410  and  1510  EST,  November  5,  1964,  without  reset- 
ting the  internal  clock 72 

29.  Orientation  of  Individual  C  when  tested  between 
1240  and  1340  EST,  November  5,  1964,  without  reset- 
ting the  internal  clock 73 

30.  Orientation  of  Individual  D  when  tested  between 
1510  and  1610  EST,  November  5,  1964,  without  reset- 
ting the  internal  clock 74 

31.  Orientation  of  Individual  D  when  tested  between 
1350  and  1450  EST,  November  10,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (5  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle) 75 

vii 


Figure  Page 

32.  Orientation  of  Individual  D  when  tested  between 
1310  and  1410  EST,  November  11,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (6  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle) 76 

33.  Orientation  of  Individual  E  when  tested  between 
1030  and  1130  EST,  November  9,  1964,  without  re- 
setting the  internal  clock 77 

34.  Orientation  of  Individual  E  when  tested  between 
1240  and  1340  EST,  November  17,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (8  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle) 78 

35.  Orientation  of  Individual  F  when  tested  between 
0930  and  1030  EST,  November  9,  1964,  without  re- 
setting the  internal  clock 79 

36.  Orientation  of  Individual  F  when  tested  betv/een 
1430  and  1530  EST,  November  16,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (7  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle 80 

37.  Orientation  of  Individual  G  when  tested  between 
1430  and  1530  EST,  October  18,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (5  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle) 81 

38.  Orientation  of  Individual  H  when  tested  between 
1530  and  1630  EST,  October  20,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (3  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle) 82 

39.  Orientation  of  Individual  I  when  tested  between 
1430  and  1530  EST,  October  23,  1964,  after  setting 
the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (4  days  in  out-of- 
phase  cycle) 83 


Vlll 


INTRODUCTION 

Migration  has  been  defined  by  Schneider  (1962)  as  a 
prolonged  escape  movement  in  which  there  is  a  tendency  to  main- 
tain a  constant  direction  and  which  results  in  the  permanent  or 
periodical  abandonment  of  a  habitat.   Migration  can  be  classi- 
fied as  dispersive,  contractive,  or  collective  according  to  the 
spatial  effect.   Many  insects  migrate  in  this  sense,  and  numerous 
accounts  of  their  migrations  can  be  found  in  the  literature.   Re- 
cent reviews  of  insect  migration  have  been  published  by  Schneider 
(1962)  and  Williams  (1957,  1958). 

In  most  of  the  migratory  insects  which  have  been  care- 
fully studied,  the  migratory  direction  is  determined  largely  by 
the  prevailing  wind.   Swarms  of  the  desert  locust  ( Schis tocerca 
gregaria  Forsk.)  are  carried  downwind,  and  since  the  winds  in 
the  lower  few  thousand  feet  of  the  atmosphere  may  be  regarded 
ultimately  as  blowing  from  areas  of  high  pressure  to  areas  of 
low  pressure,  the  downwind  displacement  results  in  movement  into 
areas  of  low  pressure  where  abundant  rainfall  produces  conditions 
favorable  for  the  reproduction  of  the  locust  (Rainey,  1951).   The 
migratory  direction  of  the  coccinellid  Hippodaniia  convergens 
Guerin-Meneville  in  California  is  determined  by  the  prevailing 
winds  at  its  flight  level  (Hagen,  1962).   In  the  summer,  .the 
prevailing  winds  at  this  level  are  from  the  low  lands  toward 


the  mountains  where  aggregation  occurs,  and  in  the  winter,  they 
are  from  the  mountains  to  the  low  lands.   The  mosquito  Aedes 
taeniorhynchus  Wiedemann  migrates  downwind  (Provost,  1952, 
1957). 

In  contrast  to  this,  many  migrating  butterflies  main- 
tain, over  long  distances,  a  constant  direction  which  is  in- 
fluenced little  by  wind,  topography,  or  time  of  day  (Williams, 
1958).   The  determination  of  migratory  direction  appears  to  be 
under  the  control  of  the  insect  itself,  but  the  nature  of  the 
underlying  orientation  mechanism  has  remained  obscure.   Only 
two  migratory  butterflies  have  been  studied  in  great  detail 
(Nielsen  and  Nielsen,  1950;  Nielsen,  1961;  Urquhart,  1960), 
and  these  studies  did  not  include  an  investigation  of  the 
orientation  mechanism.   Recent  work  on  the  orientation  of  other 
animals  has  suggested  new  approaches  to  this  problem.   (For 
references,  see  Long  Island  Biological  Association,  1960.)   The 
purpose  of  the  research  reported  here,  was  to  study  the  migra- 
tory behavior  of  the  gulf  fritillary,  Agraulis  vanillae  (L.), 
against  the  background  of  its  general  biology  and  to  investigate 
the  nature  of  the  orientation  mechanism  involved  in  maintaining 
the  migratory  direction. 

The  gulf  fritillary  is  a  member  of  the  essentially  neo- 
tropical nymphalid  subfamily  Heliconiiae.   Michener  (1942)  recog- 
nizes eight  subspecies  as  follows : 

Agraulis  vanillae  vanillae  (Linnaeus)  occurs  in  northern 
South  America,  Panama,  and  the  southernmost  of  the  Lesser 
Antilles . 


3 

Agraulis  vanillae  insularis  Maynard  ranges  throughout 
the  Bahamas  and  the  Antilles  except  for  the  southern- 
most Lesser  y\ntilles. 

Agraulis  vanillae  maculosa  (Stichel)  is  found  in  northern 
Argentina,  Paraguay,  southern  Brazil,  and  Chile. 
Agraulis  vanillae  forbesi  Michener  occurs  in  the  coastal 
region  of  Peru. 

Agraulis  vanillae  galapagensis  Holland  is  restricted  to 
the  Galapagos  Islands. 

Agraulis  vanillae  lucinia  C.  and  R.  Felder  occurs  on  the 
eastern  side  of  the  Andes  in  Ecuador,  Peru,  and  Brazil. 
Agraulis  vanillae  incarnata  (Riley)  is  occasionally 
found  as  far  north  as  British  Columbia  but  more  com- 
monly occurs  in  southwestern  United  States,  Mexico, 
and  Central  America. 

Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior  Michener  is  the  subspecies  of 
southeastern  United  States  but  is  occasionally  found  as 
far  north  as  New  York. 
The  migratory  habit  has  evolved  in  at  least  two  of  these  sub- 
species.  Definite  migrations  of  A.  v.  nigrior  to  the  north  in 
the  spring  and  to  the  south  in  the  fall  have  been  observed  in 
Florida  (Williams,  1958).   Hayward  (1962)  reported  an  eastward 
migration  of  A.  v.  maculosa  at  Tucaman,  Argentina,  on  January 
7,  1961.   The  research  reported  here  was  restricted  to  A.  v. 
nigrior.   This  form  intergrades  with  A.  v.  incarnata  in  Texas 
and  thence  southward  but  is  distinct  from  A.  v.  insularis. 


4 

The  early  stages  of  A.  v.  nigrior  were  described  long 
ago  (Edwards,  1880;  Scudder,  1889),  but  no  detailed  studies  of 
its  biology  have  been  made.   More  recently,  detailed  descrip- 
tions of  the  early  stages  of  A.  v.  vanillae  have  been  published 
(Beebe,  Crane,  and  Fleming,  1960)  and  certain  details  of  the 
adult  morphology  have  been  described  by  Emsley  (1963).   The 
biology  and  behavior  of  the  larvae,  pupae,  and  emerging  adults 
of  A.  V.  vanillae  were  discussed  by  Alexander  (1961a,  1961b) 
and  compared  with  those  of  other  members  of  the  subfamily 
occurring  in  Trinidad. 


LIFE  HISTORY 


Methods  and  Materials 


Rate  of  development 

Rearing  to  determine  the  rate  of  development  was  ini- 
tiated with  eggs  obtained  from  females  which  had  mated  in  cages. 
These  cages  were  14  inches  square  and  24  inches  high  with  sides 
of  aluminum  screen  and  top  and  botton  of  -4  inch  plywood.   A  9 
inch  square  opening  in  the  top  covered  with  a  plate  of  glass 
served  as  a  door.   One  or  more  males  and  one  or  more  females 
which  had  been  reared  in  captivity  from  larvae  were  confined 
in  a  cage  and  placed  outdoors  in  direct  sunshine.   Mating  was 
obtained  in  this  manner  using  males  1-3  days  after  emergence 
and  females  0-3  days  after  emergence.   Mating  occurred  in 
both  the  morning  and  the  afternoon  and  usually  within  2  hours 
after  the  butterflies  were  placed  in  the  cage.   Occasionally 
no  mating  occurred  even  when  the  butterflies  were  left  in  the 
cage  all  day,  but  frequently  the  same  butterflies  would  mate 
when  placed  in  the  cage  the  next  day. 

One  to  3  days  after  mating,  the  females  were  confined 
individually  with  cuttings  of  Passif lora  incarnata  L.   This 
v/as  accomplished  either  by  introducing  a  jar  of  water  containing 
the  cuttings  into  the  mating  cage  or  by  placing  a  cheesecloth 
bag  over  cuttings  contained  in  a  flower  pot  full  of  damp  sand 


6 

and  then  confining  the  butterfly  in  the  bag.   The  latter 
method  was  the  most  satisfactory.   The  confined  butterflies 
deposited  many  eggs  on  the  side  of  the  cage  or  on  the  cheese- 
cloth bag.   It  was  difficult  to  remove  the  eggs  from  the  side 
of  the  cage  v/ithout  damaging  them,  but  those  deposited  on  the 
cheesecloth  could  be  removed  by  cutting  out  the  piece  of  material 
to  which  they  were  attached. 

The  captive  butterflies  were  fed  once  a  day  on  sugar 
water  of  variable  concentration.   A  cotton  ball  was  saturated 
with  the  solution  and  placed  in  a  small  dish  containing  addi- 
tional solution.   The  butterfly  to  be  fed  was  grasped  by  the 
wings  and  its  tarsi  touched  to  the  cotton  ball.   Usually  this 
caused  the  butterfly  to  extend  its  proboscis  and  begin  feeding. 
Butterflies  which  refused  to  feed  when  touched  to  the  cotton 
ball  could  often  be  induced  to  feed  by  uncoiling  the  proboscis 
and  inserting  its  tip  in  the  sugar  v/ater.   Once  feeding  began, 
the  butterflies  remained  quietly  on  the  cotton  ball  until 
feeding  was  completed. 

The  time  required  to  complete  each  stage  of  development 
at  each  of  two  constant  temperatures  was  determined  by  rearing 
the  insects  in  a  constant  temperature  cabinet.   In  one  case,  the 
temperature  in  the  cabinet  was  maintained  at  23-24°  C.  and  in 
the  other  case  at  28.5-29.5°  C.   To  determine  the  time  required 
for  the  eggs  to  hatch,  1-7  hour  old  eggs  were  placed  in  the  cab- 
inet in  a  covered  petri  dish  and  checked  once  a  day  for  hatching. 
To  determine  the  duration  of  the  remaining  stages,  the  insects 
were  reared  individually  from  egg  to  adult  in  pint  fruit  jars. 


7 
The  caterpillars  were  kept  supplied  with  one  or  two  leaves  of 
the  food  plant.   Each  individual  was  examined  once  a  day  and 
the  dates  of  hatching,  molting,  pupation,  and  emergence  were 
recorded. 

The  larvae  suspended  for  pupation  from  the  lids  of  the 
jars  or  from  the  point  just  below  the  neck  where  the  sides 
curve  inward.   In  both  cases  the  point  of  attachment  was  too 
smooth  and  many  of  the  chrysalides  fell.   This  difficulty  was 
overcome  by  placing  a  piece  of  coarse- textured  paper  (toweling) 
beneath  the  lid  and  inserting  a  screen  cylinder  which  extended 
from  the  bottom  to  the  top  of  the  jar.   The  larvae  crawled  up 
the  cylinder  and  suspended  successfully  from  the  paper. 
Longevity  of  the  adults 

In  order  to  gain  some  idea  of  the  adult  life  span, 
butterflies  which  had  been  reared  from  eggs  in  pint  fruit 
jars  at  a  temperature  of  23-24°  C.  were  confined  individually 
in  cubic  screen  cages  4  inches  on  a  side  and  left  in  the  con- 
stant temperature  cabinet  at  the  sajne  temperature.   They  were 
fed  daily  as  described  above. 
Reproductive  development  of  the  female 

The  elapsed  time  between  the  emergence  of  a  female  and 
the  maturation  of  the  eggs  in  the  ovaries  was  determined.  For 
this  purpose,  larvae  in  various  stages  of  development  obtained 
from  the  field  and  from  eggs  laid  by  females  in'  captivity  were 
reared  together  on  food  plant  cuttings  in  screen  cages  in  a 
greenhouse.  The  larvae  were  crowded  but  were  kept  abundantly 
supplied  with  food,  and  the  adults  which  were  produced  were  of 


'  8 

normal  size.   When  the  adults  began  to  emerge,  it  became 
apparent  that  all  emergences  occurred  during  the  morning,  so 
the  cages  were  checked  each  day  at  1  hour  intervals  between 
0600  and  1200  Eastern  Standard  Time.   Each  time,  all  the  but- 
terflies that  had  emerged  during  the  preceding  hour  were  re- 
moved and  the  time  of  emergence  recorded  as  the  time  midway 
between  the  last  two  checks.   Thus  the  time  of  emergence  re- 
corded for  each  individual  was  accurate  wi.thin  +  30  minutes. 
The  females  were  confined  in  pint  fruit  jars  with  screen  lids 
and  left  in  the  greenhouse  for  periods  of  0-48  hours  with  6 
hour  increments.   They  were  then  preserved  by  injecting  them 
with  10  per  cent  formalin  and  placing  them  in  3  per  cent  forma- 
lin.  The  preserved  butterflies  were  dissected  and  the  ovaries 
examined. 
Behavior  of  adults  and  larvae 

The  behavior  of  larvae  of  all  stages  and  of  adults  was 
observed  in  the  field  and  in  screen  cages.   In  order  to  observe 
the  manner  in  which  periods  of  larval  feeding  alternate  with 
periods  of  rest  and  walking,  fifth  ins  tars  were  brought  into 
the  laboratory  from  the  field,  and  each  was  placed  on  a  bunch 
of  food  plant  cuttings  in  a  screen  cage.   The  larvae  were 
observed  for  4  hours,  and  the  times  at  which  feeding  began  and 
ended  were  recorded  for  each  individual.   These  observations 
were  made  in  the  afternoon  of  a  cloudy  day,  and  the  cages  were 
located  in  front  of  a  southwest  window.   The  sun  occasionally 
shoivn  through  the  clouds,  and  as  a  result,  the  light  intensity 
in  the  cages  varied  considerably.   However,  there  was  no  cor- 
relation between  feeding  activity  and  the  light  intensity. 


The  Egg  and  Oviposition 

The  larvae  feed  upon  Passif lora  incarnata  and  probably 
other  plants  of  the  genus,  and  the  females  oviposit  upon  and 
in  the  vicinity  of  these  plants.   Ovipositing  females  fly  low 
over  and  through  the  vegetation,  frequently  pausing  to  hover 
about  individual  plants.   When  the  butterfly  contacts  the  larval 
food  plant,  it  alights  and  deposits  an  egg.   Actual  contact  with 
the  plant  seems  to  be  essential  for  the  release  of  oviposition. 
Mated  females  confined  with  food  plant  cuttings  deposited  an 
egg  only  after  actually  touching  the  cuttings.   Mated  females 
confined  without  cuttings  did  not  oviposit.   The  stimulus  which 
releases  the  act  of  oviposition  is  probably  provided  by  a 
chemical  which  is  characteristic  of  this  genus  of  plants  and 
which  is  detected  by  gustatory  organs  in  the  tarsi  or  antennae 
of  the  butterfly. 

The  position  of  the  egg  depends  upon  where  the  female 
is  able  to  gain  a  foothold  after  contacting  the  food  plant. 
Most  eggs  are  deposited  upon  the  upper  surfaces  of  the  leaves, 
but  some  are  deposited  on  the  undersurf aces ,  stems,  tendrils, 
buds,  and  nearby  objects.   The  butterfly  curves  the  abdomen 
ventrad  until  the  oviducal  pore  contacts  the  object  upon  which 
it  has  alighted,  whereupon  it  deposits  an  egg.   In  this  process, 
the  tip  of  the  abdomen  may  be  turned  through  more  than  270 
degrees.   A  female  which  lands  on  a  leaf  surface  near  the  margin 
of  the  leaf  often  curves  the  abdomen  around  the  margin  and  de- 
posits an  egg  on  the  opposite  surface.   It  was  noted  previously 


10 

that  females  confined  in  cages  with  food  plant  cuttings  deposit 
many  of  their  eggs  on  the  side  of  the  cage.   This  results  from 
the  fact  that  the  butterflies  frequently  land  on  the  side  of 
the  cage  after  fluttering  about  and  coming  in  contact  with  the 
cuttings.   Ovipositing  females  were  observed  on  a  small  plant- 
ing of  P_.    incarnata  along  the  side  of  a  building.   Frequently 
they  would  strike  the  side  of  the  building  and  alight  after 
coming  in  contact  with  the  plants.   Each  time  this  occurred, 
they  deposited  an  egg  on  the  side  of  the  building. 

Observations  of  females  in  the  field  and  in  cages 
indicate  that  there  is  always  a  period  of  flight  after  the 
deposition  of  each  egg.   Several  eggs  were  often  found  on  the 
same  leaf,  but  this  was  probably  the  result  of  several  visits. 
In  some  cases,  this  was  borne  out  by  the  fact  that  some  of  the 
eggs  were  yellow,  while  others  were  reddish  brown  (see  follow- 
ing paragraph).   This  behavior  distributes  the  eggs  more  evenly 
over  the  available  food  supply.   Furthermore,  larvae  in  captiv- 
ity were  observed  chewing  into  unhatched  eggs,  even  in  the  pres- 
ence of  abundant  food.   The  spacing  of  the  eggs  brought  about  by 
the  egg  laying  behavior  of  the  female  reduces  losses  of  this  sort. 

The  eggs  are  yellow  when  deposited,  but  become  reddish 
brown  ^vithin  24  hours.   Thirty-nine  eggs  kept  at  a  temperature 
of  23-24°  C.  hatched  on  the  fifth  day.   Thirteen  eggs  kept  at 
a  temperature  of  28.5-29.5°  C.  hatched  on  the  third  day. 

The  Larva 
The  larva  is  illustrated  in  Figures  1  and  2. 


11 


Figure  1. 
Michener . 


Fourth  ins  tars  of  Acraulis  vanillae  n 


1.  '-4  •  X  U  i. 


12 


Figure  2. 
Michener . 


Fifth  instar  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior 


13 
Upon  hatching,  the  young  larva  consumes  the  eggshell 
before  beginning  to  feed  upon  the  food  plant,  and  newly  hatched 
larvae  were  frequently  observed  eating  unhatched  eggs  which 
they  happened  to  encounter,  even  in  the  presence  of  abundant 
food.   The  caterpillars  feed  mainly  upon  the  leaves,  but  when 
food  becomes  scarce,  they  feed  upon  the  exterior  portions  of 
the  buds  and  fruit  and  strip  the  epidermis  and  cortex  from  the 
stems.   The  first  three  ins  tars  generally  feed  away  from  the 
leaf  margins.   Newly  hatched  larvae  feeding  upon  thick  tough 
leaves  eat  only  the  epidermal  cells  of  one  surface  and  the 
mesophyll  cells,  leaving  the  epidermis  of  the  opposite  surface 
intact.   Newly  hatched  larvae  feeding  upon  thin  tender  leaves 
and  older  larvae  in  general  cut  holes  completely  through  the 
leaves.   The  two  final  ins  tars  feed  at  the  leaf  margins.   When 
ample  food  is  available,  the  portion  of  a  leaf  which  is  eaten 
before  it  is  abandoned  varies  considerably.   The  petioles  are 
almost  always  left  but  may  be  eaten,  at  least  in  part,  when 
food  becomes  scarce.   Larvae  were  never  observed  eating  one 
another,  even  when  kept  in  crowded  cages  without  food.   In  two 
instances,  however,  larvae  kept  under  these  conditions  were 
observed  eating  chrysalides. 

Alexander  (1961a)  studied  the  feeding  rhythms  of  10 
species  of  heliconiine  butterflies  in  Trinidad,  including 
Agraulis  vanillae  vanillae  (L. )  and  found  that  feeding  periods 
of  about  20-30  minutes  alternate  with  rest  periods  of  similar 
duration.   Four  fifth  instars  of  Aoraulis  vanillae  ninrior 
Michener  observed  feeding  in  the  laboratory  showed  a  similar 


14 
feeding  rhythm.   Feeding  periods  of  about  10-60  minutes  alter- 
nated with  periods  of  rest  and  walking  of  about  10-90  minutes 
(Figure  3)  . 

Frequently  a  larva  cuts  a  girdle  2-3  mm.  wide  around 
a  stem.   This  girdle  extends  only  through  the  epidermis  and 
cortex  and  does  not  kill  the  plant.   Larvae  were  observed  cut- 
ting these  girdles  many  times  in  the  field  and  in  cages,  and 
large  numbers  of  plants  were  found  with  healed  wounds  of  this 
kind.   In  one  case  which  was  timed,  girdling  of  the  stem  re- 
quired 10  minutes  (Figure  3D).       Alexander  (1961a)  found  similar 
behavior  in  the  larvae  of  several  heliconiine  butterflies  but 
apparently  not  in  the  larvae  of  A.  v.  vanillae.   The  caterpillars 
of  Heliconius  melpomene  (L. )  and  H.  ricini  (L.  )  chew  furrows 
across  the  midribs  of  leaves,  while  the  caterpillars  of  Dryas 
j^lia  (Fabr.)  and  Dryadula  phaetusa  (L.)  cut  narrow  channels 
from  the  margins  to  the  midribs.   In  all  cases  this  behavior 
is  exhibited  during  a  rest  period  and  it  is  therefore  unlikely 
that  the  material  is  eaten  solely  for  its  nutritive  value. 
Alexander  suggested  that  the  furrowing  and  channeling  behavior 
might  be  a  form  of  territory  marking.   Perhaps  the  girdling 
behavior  of  A.  v.  nigrior  also  represents  territory  marking, 
but  no  evidence  was  obtained  to  either  prove  or  disprove  this 
hypothesis . 

The  rate  of  development  of  the  larva  varies  with  tem- 
perature (Figure  4).   The  mean  duration  of  the  larval  stage 
was  15.7  days  at  23-24°  C.  and  11.5  days  at  28.5-29.5°  C. 
These  means  are  significantly  different  at  the  1  per  cent  level. 


15 


1    I    I    I   I    i   I   I 


I    I    I 


T~r 


I \  II  i^i        i       '■  1 


Figure  3.   Feeding  rhythms  of  fifth  ins  tars.   Black 
represents  resting  and  walking,  white  feeding,  and 
g  girdling.   Each  division  at  the  top  is  15  minutes. 


16 


50 


23 


2  5- 


1  ST 


^. 


•."1       .       . 


2  5-- 


2 


a 


2  NO 


,      ^ 


3  RO 


■^ 


3S 


2  5' 


4TH 


5TH 


K 


1  ST 


->*'"*'»-—>     '  » ' 


2  NO 


3RD 


— -;=-=s»- 


4  TH 


5  TH 


n 


5.5  0 

DURATION    (DAYS)    1- 


5.5 


10.5 


Figure  4.   Duration  of  the  various  ins  tars  at 
23-240  C.  (left)  and  at  28.5-29.5°  C  (right). 


17 
The  molting  and  pupation  behavior  of  A.  v.  vanillae 
was  described  in  detail  by  Alexander  (1961b).   This  probably 
does  not  differ  in  most  respects  from  that  of  A.  v.  nigrior. 
However,  Alexander  reported  that  A.  v.  vanillae  almost  in- 
variably pupates  on  the  stem,  tendrils,  flowers,  or  leaves 
of  Its  food  plant.   A.  v.  nigrior  usually  pupates  on  objects 
at  some  distance  from  the  food  plant. 

The  Pupa 

The  pupa  is  illustrated  in  Figures  5  and  6. 

Histograms  of  the  duration  of  this  stage  are  presented 
in  Figures  7  and  8.   The  mean  duration  was  11.7  days  at  23- 
24°  C.  and  7.5  days  at  28.5-29.5°  C.   These  means  are  signifi- 
cantly different  at  the  1  per  cent  level. 

The  Adult 

Emergence 

Apparently  most  emergence  from  the  chrysalid  occurs 
during  the  morning.   Butterflies  which  were  reared  from  larvae 
in  a  greenhouse  during  September  under  the  natural  day-night 
cycle  emerged  between  0600  and  1200  with  maximum  emergence  oc- 
curring between  0900  and  1000  (Figure  9).   On  the  days  during 
which  emergence  occurred,  morning  civil  twilight  began  at  ap- 
proximately 0550  and  sunrise  was  at  approximately  0610.   Alexan- 
der (1961b)  noted  a  similar  time  of  emergence  for  the  heliconiint 
butterflies  Heliconius  erato  (L.)  and  H.  melpomene  in  Trinidad. 
Upon  emergence,  the  butterfly  hangs  from  the  pupal  skin 


18 


Figure  5.   Dorsal  view  of  pupa  of  Agraulis  vanillae 
nigrior  Michener. 


19 


Figure  6.   Lateral  view  of  pupa  of  Agraulis  vanillae 
nigrior  Michener. 


20 


(r«qu«ncy 

i  0 


3i 


n 

■J  ,  n 


^  tioy* 


Jl.S 


10. s 


li.i 


Figure   7.       IXiration   of   pupa   at   23-24°   C. 


SO 


7S 


-, , — .doy  . 


tS.J 


0  5.S  1.0.5 

Figure  8.   Duration  of  pupa  at  28.5-29.5°  C. 


21 


fr  tqucnc  y 
60. 


30 


SJBi^ 


■  \. 


I    • 


1     >     «     I 


06 


12 


I        ,     t  im>(E  ST) 


\  8 


3  4 


Figure  9.   Time  of  emergence  of  the  adult. 


22 

until  the  wings  have  expanded  and  dried  (Figure  10).   Expansion 
of  the  wings  requires  from  3-4  minutes,  and  they  are  dry  enough 
for  flight  within  an  hour. 
Sex  ratio 

Of  265  butterflies  which  emerged  in  captivity  54  per 
cent  were  males  and  46  per  cent  females.   This  sex  ratio  is 
not  significantly  different  from  1:1  at  the  5  per  cent  level. 
Reproductive  development  of  the  female 

Dissections  of  preserved  females  indicated  that  most 
individuals  reach  reproductive  maturity  12-18  hours  after 
emergence,  although  a  few  individuals  are  still  not  mature  48 
hours  after  emergence.   Mature  eggs  could  be  recognized  in  the 
preserved  specimens  by  their  morphology.   In  these  eggs,  there 
was  a  central  dark  yellow  mass  occupying  no  more  than  3/4  the 
volume  of  the  egg,  and  the  transparent  chorion  was  very  con- 
spicuous.  In  the  immature  eggs,  the  entire  volume  of  the  egg 
was  occupied  by  cream  colored  or  pale  yellow  material,  and  the 
chorion,  when  it  was  present,  was  not  so  conspicuous.   Length 
proved  to  be  an  unreliable  criterion  for  determining  egg 
maturity.   Oviposited  eggs  which  subsequently  produced  larvae 
ranged  in  length  from  1.30-1.60  mm.   All  the  mature  eggs  fell 
v/ithin  this  size  range.   However,  in  several  cases  immature 
eggs  1.30  mm.  long  were  found. 
Mating  behavior 

Females  will  mate  within  24  hours  after  emergence  and 
will  mate  at  least  as  long  as  3  days  after  emergence  as  pointed 
out  in  the  discussion  of  methods  and  materials.   Males  will 


23 


Figure  10,   Recently  emerged  adult  of  Agraulis 
vanillae  nigrior  Michener  hanging  from  the  pupal 
skin . 


24 
mate  at  least  as  early  as  1  day  after  emergence  and  as  late  as 
3  days  after  emergence.   No  experiments  were  conducted  to  de- 
termine the  two  extremes  of  age  at  which  each  sex  will  mate. 
No  courtship  was  observed  in  the  field,  and  that  ob- 
served in  cages  was  probably  greatly  abbreviated.   The  confined 
butterflies  alternately  rested  on  the  sides  of  the  cage  and 
fluttered  against  the  sides  and  top  of  the  cage.   When  a 
fluttering  male  approached  a  resting  female,  the  female  usually 
responded  by  elevating  the  abdomen  and  vibrating  the  wings  with 
the  hind  wings  opened  90  degrees  and  the  fore  ivings  opened  about 
45  degrees.   Then  the  male  would  land  beside  the  female  facing 
the  same  direction,  vibrate  his  wings,  and  thrust  at  the  female's 
abdomen  with  the  end  of  his  abdomen.   During  this  process,  the 
female  would  continue  to  vibrate  her  wings  in  the  described 
position.   When  the  ends  of  the  abdomens  came  in  contact,  the 
male  would  grasp  the  end  of  the  female's  abdomen  with  his  claspers 
and  then  turn  180  degrees  to  assume  the  copulatory  position. 
Occasionally  mating  occurred  even  when  the  female  shovjed  no 
response  to  the  male.   When  both  the  male  and  the  female  were 
fluttering,  the  female  would  land  on  the  side  of  the  cage,  and 
the  process  would  proceed  as  described.   Copulation  lasted  from 
45-60  minutes.   A  detailed  study  of  the  mating  behavior  including 
the  roles  played  by  motion,  color,  size,  shape,  pattern,  and  odor 
remains  to  be  done.   Crane  (1955)  has  made  such  a  study  of  the 
related  butterfly  Heliconius  erato ,  and  many  of  her  conclusions 
will  probably  be  found  to  apply  equally  well  to  Agraulis  vanillae . 


25 

Longevity  of  the  adults 

Nine  males  and  nine  females  kept  in  a  constant  tem- 
perature cabinet  at  23-24°  C.  lived  from  14-27  days  after 
emergence.   The  mean  life  span  was  18.4  days  with  a  standard 
deviation  of  3.0  days.   There  was  no  significant  difference 
between  the  mean  longevity  of  the  males  and  females  at  the 
10  per  cent  level.   Since  these  butterflies  were  unmated  and 
were  not  subjected  to  the  same  stresses  normally  encountered 
in  nature,  the  observed  life  span  is  perhaps  slightly  longer 
than  that  of  the  species  in  nature. 


DISTRIBUTION  OF  LARVAL  FOOD  PLANTS 

Presumably  any  species  of  Passif lora  can  serve  as  a 
food  plant  for  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior ,  but  only  P.  incarnata 
was  examined  for  eggs  and  larvae.   Only  two  species  of  Passi- 
f lora  are  widely  distributed  in  the  United  States  (Killip,  1938) 
Passif lora  incarnata  ranges  from  Virginia  to  Missouri  and  south 
to  Florida  and  Texas  but  has  been  introduced  farther  north. 
Passiflora  lutea  L.  ranges  from  Pennsylvania  to  Illinois  and 
Kansas  and  southward  to  Florida  and  Texas. 

Seven  species  of  Passiflora  have  been  recorded  from 
Florida  (Killip,  1938),  but  no  detailed  account  of  their  distri- 
bution within  the  state  has  been  published.   A  general  idea  of 
their  distribution  was  obtained  from  specimens  in  the  herbarium 
of  the  University  of  Florida  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Apparently  P.  sexf  lora  Juss .  ,  P^.  pallens  Poepp.  ex  Mast.,  P. 
multif lora  L. ,  and  P.  foetida  L.  are  restricted  to  the  extreme 
southern  portion  of  the  state.   Passiflora  lutea  occurs  in 
northern  penninsular  Florida  and  in  West  Florida.   Passiflora 
suberosa  L.  ranges  throughout  peninsular  Florida.   Passiflora 
incarnata  occurs  throughout  the  state  but  is  apparently  less 
common  in  the  south  and  west.   With  the  exception  of  P.  incar- 
nata, which  occurs  largely  in  old  fields  and  along  roadsides, 
these  plants  appear  to  occur  largely  in  wooded  areas. 

26 


POPULATIONS  OF  Agraulis  vanillae  IN  THE  VICINITY 
OF  GAINESVILLE,  FLORIDA 


Description  of  Observed  Breeding  Areas 

Adult  gulf  fritillaries  can  be  found  in  almost  any  open 
situation.   However,  at  least  in  north  central  Florida,  their 
reproduction  is  limited  to  rather  small  widely  scattered  areas 
by  the  patchy  nature  of  the  food  plant  distribution.   Four  such 
areas  in  the  vicinity  of  Gainesville,  Florida,  with  growths  of 
Passiflora  incarnata  were  selected  for  observation  (Figure  11). 
Area  1  measured  approximately  120  x  220  feet  and  lay  in  an  old 
field  with  growths  of  broomsedge  ( Andropogon  glomeratus  /Walt_^/ 
BSP)  and  Blackberry  ( Rubus  sp.).   Late  in  the  summer  the  food 
plants  were  almost  hidden  by  a  dense  growth  of  ragweed  ( Ambro- 
sia artemisiifolia  L.).   Area  2  measured  approximately  50  x  70 
feet  and  was  also  in  an  old  field  with  growths  of  broomsedge 
and  blackberry,  but  ragweed  was  absent.   Area  3  measured  approxi- 
mately 90  X  200  feet.   The  dominant  plants  were  broomsedge, 
blackberry,  groundsel- tree  ( Baccharis  halimifolia  L. ) ,  elder 
(Sambucus  canadensis  L. ) ,  and  shining  sumac  ( Rhus  copallinum 
L.).   The  growth  of  Passiflora  in  this  area  was  extremely  dense. 
Area  4  measured  approximately  90  x  140  feet  and  lay  in  a  pine 
flatwoods.   Longleaf  pine  ( Pinus  palustris  Mill.)  was  the  domi- 
nant plant.   There  were  widely  scattered  shrubs  including 


27 


28 


U  S  4  4  \ 


F  1  o  2  4 


F  I  o  2  4 


U  S  4  4  1 


Figure  11.   Breeding  areas  in  the  vicinity  of 
Gainesville,  Florida 


29 
waxmyrtle  ( Myrica  cerif era  L. ) ,  live  oak  ( Quercus  vi  rginiana 
Mill .  )  ,  water  oak  ( Quercus  nigra  L. ) ,  Daubentonia  punicea  (Cav. ) 
DC,    groundsel- tree ,  and  shining  sumac.   Blackberry  was  a  dominant 
plant  of  the  ground  cover. 

Fluctuations  in  the  Observed  Populations 

It  was  not  possible  to  obtain  an  estimate  of  the  actual 
number  of  eggs  and  larvae  present  in  a  given  breeding  area  at  a 
given  time.   However,  it  was  possible  to  obtain  an  index  of  this 
number  and  thereby  observe  fluctuations.   This  was  done  by  arbi- 
trarily choosing  75  plants  in  such  a  way  that  all  portions  of 
the  breeding  area  were  represented  and  counting  the  number  of 
eggs  and  larvae  on  the  terminals  and  first  six  leaves.   Later 
in  the  season,  when  the  plant  population  began  to  decline,  it 
was  sometimes  not  possible  to  find  75  plants.   In  this  case, 
as  many  plants  as  could  be  found  were  exaimined. 

The  number  of  plants  examined  and  the  number  of  eggs 
and  larvae  found  at  various  times  between  July,  1964,  and  May, 
1965,  are  presented  for  each  of  the  four  observed  breeding  areas 
in  Tables  1-4.   In  all  cases  except  Area  4,  the  number  of  eggs 
and  larvae  increased  slightly  during  July  and  then  remained 
fairly  constant  until  the  end  of  August  when  there  was  a  rapid 
increase.   Area  4  was  apparently  unoccupied  until  the  latter 
part  of  August  when  large  numbers  of  eggs  and  larvae  appeared 
there.   In  all  cases  this  rapid  increase  in  numbers  caused  a 
marked  reduction  in  the  available  food.   The  available  food  was 
reduced  further  in  Area  1  by  large  numbers  of  blister  beetles 


30 


TABLE  1 
OBSERVED  NUMBER  OF  EGGS  AND  LARVAE  IN  AREA  1  (1964-65) 


Plants 

Eggs 

La 

rval  Ins 

tar 

Eggs 
and 

Date 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Larvae 

1  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

1 

2 

22  Jul 

75 

17 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

20 

28  Jul 

75 

10 

1 

0 

1 

1 

0 

13 

5  Aug 

75 

25 

3 

0 

0 

0 

3 

31 

15  Aug 

75 

15 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1 

17 

27  Aug 

75 

62 

22 

3 

2 

2 

7 

98 

6  Sep 

75 

51 

19 

6 

3 

14 

7 

100 

29  Sep 

75 

17 

21 

14 

2 

18 

14 

86 

20  Oct 

42 

3 

16 

6 

3 

11 

12 

51 

12  Nov 

11 

0 

0 

1 

11 

2 

2 

16 

2  Dec 

5 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

2 

20  Dec 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

14  Mar 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3  Apr 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

15  Apr 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2  May 

75 

0 

0 

0 

2 

1 

2 

5 

31 


TABLE  2 
OBSERVED  NUMBER  OF  EGGS  AND  LARVAE  IN  AREA  2  (1964-65) 


La 

rval  Instar 

Eggs 

Date 

Plants 

Eggs 

and 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Larvae 

8  Jul 

75 

0  ^ 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1 

16  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

22  Jul 

75 

1 

0 

2 

3 

3 

3 

12 

4  Aug 

75 

5 

2 

6 

3 

7 

10 

33 

12  Aug 

75 

5 

0 

0 

1 

3 

9 

18 

19  Aug 

75 

17 

1 

0 

2 

3 

1 

24 

26  Aug 

75 

33 

8 

2 

0 

2 

1 

46 

6  Sep 

75 

36 

13 

7 

0 

4 

15 

75 

24  Sep 

25 

13 

16 

12 

6 

1 

9 

57 

7  Oct 

5 

3 

2 

1 

0 

2 

1 

9 

2  Nov 

13 

3 

1 

2 

0 

2 

0 

8 

18  Nov 

10 

10 

29 

5 

3 

3 

5 

55 

2  Dec 

13 

0 

2 

2 

4 

8 

0 

16 

20  Dec 

4 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

14  Mar 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3  Apr 

24 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

24  Apr 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

32 


TABLE  3 
OBSERVED  NUMBER  OF  EGGS  AND  LARVAE  IN  AREA  3  (1964-65) 


La: 

trval  Ins 

tar 

Eggs 

Date 

Plants 

Eggs 

and 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Larvae 

18  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1 

26  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

4  Aug 

75 

3 

0 

0 

0 

1 

4 

8 

11  Aug 

75 

7 

0 

0 

2 

0 

1 

10 

18  Aug 

75 

8 

0 

0 

0 

1 

3 

12 

30  Aug 

75 

12 

1 

1 

4 

11 

11 

40 

20  Sep 

75 

44 

5 

0 

4 

5 

5 

63 

7  Oct 

75 

15 

15 

10 

9 

12 

26 

87 

20  Oct 

75 

10 

10 

2 

1 

3 

2 

28 

2  Nov 

75 

10 

7 

1 

1 

3 

3 

25 

19  Nov 

75 

12 

7 

4 

5 

7 

4 

39 

7  Dec 

75 

2 

2 

5 

3 

1 

1 

14 

28  Dec 

75 

4 

1 

0 

1 

3 

0 

9 

16  Jan 

75 

10 

6 

2 

0 

0 

1 

19 

4  Feb 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

14  Mar 

13 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3  Apr 

75 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

24  Apr 

75 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

3 

33 


TABLE  4 
OBSERVED  NUMBER  OF  EGGS  AND  LARVAE  IN  AREA  4  (1964-65) 


Date 

Plants 

Eggs 

L, 

arval  Instar 

Eggs 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

and 
Larvae 

3  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

18  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

27  Jul 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

6  Aug 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

24  Aug 

75 

32 

1 

1 

1 

1 

3 

39 

2  Sep 

75 

7 

7 

8 

15 

16 

14 

67 

24  Sep 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

14  Mar 

4 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3  Apr 

75 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2  May 

75 

0 

0 

1 

3 

0 

0 

4 

34 
(Meloidae)  which  seemed  to  be  particularly  attracted  to  Passi- 
flora.   In  Area  3,  where  the  growth  of  Passiflora  was  very  dense, 
the  food  supply  remained  abundant  in  spite  of  the  reduction,  and 
the  destroyed  plants  were  soon  replaced  by  new  growth.   In  the 
other  areas  there  was  only  a  small  amount  of  new  growth,  and  it 
soon  became  impossible  to  find  75  plants.   The  reduction  in  food 
plants  was  especially  marked  in  Area  4  where  it  was  impossible 
to  find  any  plants  31  days  after  eggs  and  larvae  were  first  dis- 
covered there.   The  insect  was  therefore  absent  from  this  site 
until  the  following  spring.   In  the  other  localities,  the  number 
of  eggs  and  larvae  began  declining  in  October.   Area  2  showed 
a  second  peak  in  mid-November  and  then  declined  again.   On  Decem- 
ber 1,  a  minimum  temperature  of  30°  F.  was  recorded  at  Gaines- 
ville Municipal  Airport  (U.S.  Weather  Bureau,  1964).   This  tem- 
perature was  taken  in  an  instrument  shelter  5  feet  above  the 
ground,  and  it  is  reasonable  to  expect  that  the  temperature  in 
the  open  near  the  ground  was  slightly  lower  due  to  the  loss  of 
heat  by  radiation.   The  terminals  and  young  leaves  of  exposed 
plants  in  areas  1  and  3  were  damaged  by  this  low  temperature, 
while  those  growing  under  shrubs  were  not.   No  damage  occurred 
to  the  plants  in  area  2,  probably  due  to  the  moderating  in- 
fluence of  the  nearby  water  (Figure  11).   The  larvae  were  appar- 
ently not  injured  by  this  frost.   No  further  freezing  tempera- 
tures occurred  until  January  when  minimum  temperatures  below 
32°  F.  were  recorded  at  the  airport  on  8  days  and  below  28°  F. 
on  3  days  (U.S.  Weather  Bureau,  1965).   This  was  sufficiently 
low  to  kill  all  the  plants.   New  shoots  emerged  in  March.   Ap- 
parently the  first  eggs  were  deposited  early  in  April. 


35 

These  observations  indicate  considerable  overlapping 
of  the  generations.   This  is  to  be  expected  since  the  oviposi- 
tion  period  for  each  female  is  relatively  long,  and  the  time 
required  for  the  insect  to  pass  from  egg  to  adult  is  relatively 
short. 

There  were  seldom  more  than  a  few  adults  present  in  a 
breeding  area  when  observations  were  made  regardless  of  time 
of  day  and  size  of  larval  population.   Apparently  the  adults 
spend  only  brief  periods  in  the  breeding  areas  for  oviposition 
and  possibly  for  mating. 


THE  FALL  MIGRATION 


Methods  and  Materials 


Observational  setup 

Migrations  of  the  gulf  fritillary  were  observed  during 
October,  1963,  and  September,  October,  and  November,  1964,  in  a 
large  open  field  near  Gainesville,  Florida.   A  circle  50  feet 
in  diameter  was  laid  out  in  this  field.   The  circle  was  marked 
by  bottles  5  inches  high  and  1.5  inches  in  diameter  buried  up 
to  their  necks  at  20  degree  intervals  around  the  circumference. 
Before  each  observation  period,  a  stake  4  feet  long  was  in- 
serted in  each  of  the  bottles.   The  stakes  were  labeled  with 
large  black  numbers  beginning  with  1  at  north  and  continuing 
clockwise  to  18.   After  each  observation  period,  the  stakes 
were  removed  and  the  bottles  capped.   The  circle  is  shown  set 
up  for  observations  in  Figure  12.   Observations  were  made  from 
stations  8  feet  outside  the  circle.   There  was  one  station 
directly  outside  each  stake,  and  they  were  used  in  random  order 
with  a  different  station  for  each  day  of  observations. 
Weather  observations 

Wind  speed  and  direction  were  measured  by  means  of  a 
cup  anemometer  and  wind  vane  connected  to  remote  wind  speed  and 
direction  indicators  (Nassau  Windmaster,  Model  No.  409,  Science 
Associates,  Princeton,  New  Jersey,  Figures  13-14).   The  anemom- 

36 


37 


Figure  12.   Setup  for  observing  migrations 


38 


Figure  13.   Wind  vane  and  anemometer  used  in  migration  studies 


39 


^-^^ 


\^  i-v 


^'.;.^:\^ 


Figure  14, 
studies . 


Wind  speed  and  direction  dials  used  in  migration 


40 
eter  and  wind  vane  were  mounted  at  a  height  of  5  feet  on  a 
tripod  placed  25  feet  outside  the  circle  and  20  degrees  clock- 
wise from  the  observation  station  (Figure  15).   The  remote  in- 
dicators were  at  the  observation  position.   Wind  observations 
were  made  every  half  hour  in  1963  and  every  5  minutes  in  1964. 
Sky  cover  and  weather  conditions  were  recorded  every  hour  un- 
less a  major  change  occurred  during  the  course  of  an  hour. 
Sky  cover  was  classified  according  to  the  fraction  of  the 
celestial  dome  covered  by  clouds  as  follows: 

Clear  --  less  than  1/10 

Scattered  --  1/10-5/10 

Broken  --  6/10-9/10 

Overcast  --  more  than  9/10 
The  term  thin  was  applied  to  any  of  the  above  when  the  sun  was 
clearly  visible  through  the  clouds.   Hourly  temperatures  were 
obtained  from  U.S.  Weather  Bureau  records  for  Gainesville  Mu- 
nicipal Airport  which  is  approximately  7  miles  from  the  obser- 
vation site.   The  temperatures  were  taiken  in  a  standard  in- 
strument shelter  at  a  height  of  5  feet  and  were  probably  rep- 
resentative of  air  temperatures  over  the  entire  Gainesville 
area. 
Speed  and  direction  of  flight 

In  describing  the  flight  speed  and  direction  of  migrat- 
ing butterflies,  it  is  convenient  to  employ  the  terminology  of 
aircraft  navigation.   The  following  terms  are  used: 

Track  --  the  migrant's  direction  relative  to  the  ground. 

Ground  speed  --  the  migrant's  speed  relative  to  the  ground. 


41 


Figure  15.   Wind  vane  and  anemometer  mounted  on 
tripod  for  observations . 


42 

Course  --  the  direction  in  which  the  migrant  is  heading. 

Air  speed  --  the  migrant's  speed  relative  to  the  air. 

Wind  direction  --  the  direction  from  which  the  wind  blows. 

Wind  speed  --  speed  of  the  wind. 

The  track  of  each  migrant  crossing  the  circle  was  deter- 
mined by  recording  the  numbers  of  the  stakes  between  which  it 
entered  and  left  the  circle.   It  was  assumed  that  the  points  of 
entrance  and  exit  were  midway  between  the  stakes  through  which 
the  migrant  passed.   A  line  through  the  center  of  the  circle 
parallel  to  the  line  through  these  two  points  gives  the  track 
within  +  10  degrees.   Ground  speed  was  determined  by  measuring 
with  a  stop  watch  the  time  required  for  a  migrant  to  cross  the 
circle  and  noting  the  points  of  entrance  and  exit  as  described 
above.   The  wind  speed  and  direction  read  at  the  time  the  mi- 
grant left  the  circle  were  assumed  to  represent  the  wind  speed 
and  direction  as  it  was  crossing  the  circle.   The  ground  speed, 
g,  in  miles  per  hour  is  given  by  the  expression 

sin  h<^ 
g  =  34.1  1 

where  t  is  the  time  in  seconds  required  for  the  migrant  to 
cross  the  circle  and  o<  is  the  angle  subtending  the  chord  of 
the  circle  which  represents  the  path  of  the  butterfly  through 
the  circle. 

In  calculating  air  speed  and  course,  angles  were 
measured  counter-clockwise  from  0  to  180  degrees  and  clock- 
wise from  0  to  -180  degrees  with  respect  to  the  vector  rep- 
resenting the  track,  using  the  tail  of  the  vector  as  the  origin 
(Figure  16).   The  air  speed,  v,  is  given  in  miles  per  hour  by 


3:180 


43 


+  9  0 


'  Wi  nd    or    Court* 


e  Of  ^   >  0 


Q  ox  ^  <  0 


-^-    0  Trot  k 


W ■ nd   or    Cour i« 


-90 


Figure  16.   Convention  used  in  measuring  angles 
between  track  and  wind  direction  (0)  and  between 
track  and  course  (0). 


44 

the  expression 

V  =  g  -  w  cos  6, 

where  w  is  the  wind  speed  in  miles  per  hour  and  G  is  the  angle 

between  the  wind  direction  and  the  track.   The  true  bearing  of 

the  course,  c,  is  given  by  the  expression 

c  =  a  -  0, 

where  a  is  the  true  bearing  of  the  track,  0  is  the  angle  between 

the  course  and  the  track,  and 

w  sin  6 
sin  0  =  -  . 

V 

Density  of  the  migration 

The  density  of  the  migration  is  expressed  as  the  number 
of  migrants  per  mile  per  hour  crossing  a  northeast  to  southwest 
line  through  Gainesville,  Florida.   This  quantity  was  estimated 
by  determining  the  number  of  migrants  crossing  the  circle  in 
one  hour.   Since  the  point  of  entrance  or  exit  was  inadvertently 
missed  for  some  of  the  butterflies,  this  estimate  was  not  as 
accurate  as  it  might  have  been.   Of  those  migrants  whose  track 
was  determined,  97.8  per  cent  had  track  bearings  between  100 
and  180  degrees.   It  is  apparent  from  the  geometry  of  the  circle 
that  any  migrant  crossing  the  circle  and  having  a  track  bearing 
within  this  range  must  cross  a  northeast  to  southwest  line  66.4 
feet  long  with  its  midpoint  at  the  center  of  the  circle  (assum- 
ing that  all  migrants  enter  and  leave  the  circle  at  points  mid- 
way between  two  stakes).   Since  some  of  the  migrants  had  track 
bearings  outside  this  range,  the  assumption  that  all  migrants 
passing  through  the  circle  cross  this  line  results  in  a  positive 
error  in  the  density  estimate.   On  the  other  hand,  this  line 


45 
extends  8.2  feet  beyond  the  circle  on  either  side.   Therefore, 
the  assumption  that  only  those  migrants  passing  through  the 
circle  cross  the  line  results  in  a  negative  error  in  the  density 
estimate.   Since  both  of  these  errors  are  probably  small,  and 
since  one  at  least  partially  cancels  the  other,  a  fair  estimate 
of  the  migration  density  can  be  obtained  by  multiplying  the  num- 
ber of  migrants  crossing  the  circle  in  one  hour  by  79.5  (the 
number  of  times  66.4  feet  is  contained  in  1  mile). 

A  better  estimate  could  have  been  obtained  if  the 
points  of  entrance  and  exit  had  been  noted  for  every  butterfly 
crossing  the  circle.   Then  it  would  have  been  possible  in  mak- 
ing the  estimate  to  consider  only  those  migrants  which  crossed 
the  northeast  to  southwest  diameter  of  the  circle,  and  both 
types  of  error  would  have  been  eliminated.   Furthermore,  in 
discussing  migration  density,  it  would  be  desirable  to  separate 
those  butterflies  which  are  flying  southward  from  those  which 
are  flying  northward.   This  could  be  done  if  the  track  of  every 
migrant  crossing  the  circle  were  known. 
Reproductive  maturity  of  the  females  and  sex  ratio 

Migrating  gulf  fritillaries  were  captured  with  a  butter- 
fly net  to  determine  the  sex  ratio  among  them.   Some  of  the 
females  were  preserved  as  described  previously  and  later  dis- 
sected to  determine  their  reproductive  maturity  and  if  they  had 
mated. 


46 
Description  of  the  Migration 

Characteristics  of  the  migratory  flight 

Migrating  gulf  fritillaries  fly  at  a  height  of  3-6 
feet  over  open  terrain,  and  upon  encountering  an  obstacle, 
such  as  a  building  or  a  wooded  area,  they  fly  up  and  over  it 
without  changing  their  direction.   In  general,  the  flight  is 
very  persistent,  but  occasionally  they  pause  briefly  to  feed 
at  flowers.   The  direction  of  most  individuals  lies  between 
110  and  160  degrees  (Figure  17)  and  does  not  vary  with  time 
of  day  (Figure  18).   While  the  path  of  a  migrant  over  the  earth 
may  be  influenced  by  the  wind,  the  migratory  direction  is  not 
determined  by  this  factor  (Figure  19).   Instead,  it  appears 
to  be  under  the  control  of  the  insect  itself. 

The  direction  of  a  flying  animal  relative  to  the 
earth's  surface  is  determined  by  its  motion  through  the  air  and 
by  the  motion  of  the  air  itself.   If  the  animal  maintains  a 
constant  course,  fluctuations  in  the  crosswind  will  cause 
fluctuations  in  its  track.   To  maintain  a  constant  track,  it 
must  alter  its  course  to  compensate  for  these  fluctuations  or, 
in  other  words,  correct  for  wind  drift.   The  crosswinds  ob- 
served during  this  study  were  too  light  to  determine  if  migrat- 
ing gulf  fritillaries  make  this  correction. 

The  ground  speed  of  a  flying  animal  is  a  function  of 
the  energy  it  expends  per  unit  time  and  of  the  wind  component 
along  its  course.   If  the  animal  expends  a  constant  amount  of 
energy,  its  ground  speed  will  be  less  with  a  head  wind  than  with 


47 


N 


3=10 


Figure  17.   Tracks  of  migrants  observed  during 
the  fall  of  1963  (A)  and  1964  (B).   The  numbers 
in  the  circles  represent  the  total  number  of 
migrants  observed  in  each  case. 


48 


Figure  18.   Tracks  of  migrants  observed  at  various  times 
of  day  on  September  23,  1964.   (A)  0800-0900  EST,  (B)  1000- 
1100  EST,  (C)  1200-1300  EST,  (D)  1300-1400  EST,  (E)  1400- 
1500  EST,  (F)  1600-1700  EST.   The  numbers  in  the  circles 
represent  the  total  number  of  migrants  observed  in  each 
case. 


49 


N 


\ 


Figure  19.  Tracks  of  migrants  and  mean  wind  speed  and 
direction  observed  between  1300  and  1400  EST  on  various 
days  in  the  fall  of  1964.  Wind  direction  is  indicated 
in  each  case  by  the  direction  of  the  arrow.  Each  full 
barb  in  the  tail  represents  2  miles  per  hour  of  wind 
speed.  The  numbers  in  the  circles  represent  the  total 
number  of  migrants  observed  in  each  case. 


50 
a  tail  wind,  while  its  air  speed  will  be  the  same  in  both  cases. 
To  maintain  a  constant  ground  speed,  it  must  alter  its  energy 
output  to  allow  for  the  effect  of  wind,  and  since  it  is  a 
function  of  the  energy  expenditure,  the  air  speed  will  vary. 

Within  the  range  of  observed  winds,  it  appears  that  each 
gulf  fritillary  expends  a  more  or  less  constant  amount  of  energy, 
but  this  amount  varies  from  individual  to  individual.   The 
ground  speed  of  23  individuals  flying  in  calm  air  ranged  from 
6.9-14.6  miles  per  hour  with  a  mean  of  10.4  (Figure  20),  while 
that  of  11  individuals  flying  against  a  head  wind  of  1-5  miles 
per  hour  ranged  from  6.7-11.4  with  a  mean  of  8.4  (Figure  21A)  , 
and  that  of  9  individuals  flying  with  a  tail  wind  of  1-4  miles 
per  hour  ranged  from  8.8-15.6  with  a  mean  of  12.1  (Figure  21B). 
The  means  are  significantly  different  at  the  5  per  cent  level. 
The  air  speed  of  the  headwind  group  ranged  from  8.6-14.6  with 
a  mean  of  11.2  (Figure  22A) ,  and  that  of  the  tailwind  group 
ranged  from  8.8-13.3  with  a  mean  of  11.0  (Figure  22B).   The 
means  are  not  significantly  different  at  the  20  per  cent  level. 
It  follows  that  the  ground  speed  will  decrease  as  the  head  wind 
increases  until  the  butterfly  must  increase  its  energy  output, 
land,  or  be  carried  backwards.   Which  of  these  alternatives 
actually  occurs  was  not  determined.   The  head  winds  did  not 
reach  this  magnitude  during  the  course  of  the  present  study, 
and  they  seldom  do  at  the  flight  level  of  the  migrants. 
Variations  in  migration  density 

The  migration  densities  determined  between  1300  and 
1400  Eastern  Standard  Time  on  various  dates  during  the  course 


51 


par    c  an  I  <  raqwancy 
60 


30   , 


o.ss 


s. 


)0.55        20.55 


Figure  20.   Ground  speed  of  migrants 
flying  in  calm  air. 


52 


A. 


p«r<«nl   tr«qw*ncy, 
«0 


30 


-i>.JS 


»       > 

lO.SS  20.53 


tpaed  (M  PH) 


p«r  cant    «  raqwcny 
60       . 


30  .  . 


in 


»   t '  »    > 


O.ii 


10. S3 


_,__,ip««d(M  PH) 
20.35 


Figure  21.   Ground  speed  of  migrants  flying  against  a 
head  wind  of  1-5  miles  per  hour  (A)  and  with  a  tail  wind, 
of  1-4  miles  per  hour  (B). 


53 


p«  r  c*  n  I   i  r^quan  c  y 
60 


30 


•       •       I 


1       i» 


p««d  (MPH) 


.0.55 


10.55 


ao.s5 


parcani    lr*c|u«ny 


B. 


rrr 

r    •      r^ 

30    .  . 

' 

• 

;              : 

0 

1 pa«d (M  P  H) 


0.55 


10.55 


20.55 


Figure  22 . '  Air  speed  of  migrants  flying  against 
a  head  wind  of  1-5  miles  per  hour  (A)  and  with  a 
tail  wind  of  1-4  miles  per  hour  (B). 


54 
of  the  1964  migration  are  presented  in  Table  5.   The  density 
varies  considerably  from  day  to  day,  but  in  general,  the  migra- 
tion is  heavier  during  the  first  half  of  the  migratory  period. 
The  greatest  density  observed  would  be  classified  as  extremely 
thin  according  to  the  scheme  of  Williams  (1958).   Wind  speed 
and  direction  within  the  limits  observed  do  not  seem  to  affect 
the  number  of  migrants  flying.   It  appears  that  cloud  cover 
does  not  influence  the  migration  density  unless  the  sky  is 
overcast,  and  then  the  migration  ceases.   On  four  occasions, 
observations  were  begun  within  1.5  hours  after  sunrise  (Table 
6).   On  three  of  these  days,  the  day's  migration  had  not  yet 
started  when  observations  were  begun.   The  sky  condition  was 
either  clear  or  scattered  on  all  of  these  days.   These  data 
suggest   that  the  time  at  which  the  migrants  begin  flying  could 
be  determined  by  either  temperature  or  light  intensity.   On 
September  23,  1964,  the  sky  was  clear  and  the  wind  was  light 
and  variable  all  day,  and  observations  were  made  throughout  the 
day.   The  migratory  activity  ceased  quite  abruptly  at  1715 
EST  (about  1.25  hours  before  sunset).   Based  on  the  observations 
of  this  day,  the  migration  density  does  not  seem  to  vary  in  a 
regular  manner  with  time  of  day  (Table  7). 
Reproductive  maturity  of  the  females  and  sex  ratio 

Of  43  migrants  captured  between  September  22  and  Novem- 
ber 7,  1964,  72  per  cent  were  females  and  28  per  cent  were  males. 
This  sex  ratio  is  significantly  different  from  1:1  at  the  0.5 
per  cent  level.   Since  there  is  no  reason  to  believe  that  fe- 
males are  more  easily  captured  than  males,  it  appears  that  while 


55 


TABLE   5 

DENSITY   OF   MIGRATION    AND  WEATHER   OBSERVED 
1300-1400   EST    (1964) 


Date 

Number 

Crossing 

Circle 

Density 

Sky  Cover 

Wind 

Speed 

Direction 

20  Sep 

9 

718 

Scattered 

00-15 

360-060 

23  Sep 

12 

954 

Clear 

00 

25  Sep 

7 

556 

Thin  Broken 

00-07 

030-110 

29  Sep 

3 

238 

Broken 

00-08 

100-170 

5  Oct 

0 

0 

Overcast 

06-19 

250-280 

7  Oct 

1 

80 

Scattered 

05-12 

330-060 

9  Oct 

10 

795 

Scattered 

00-08 

360-090 

23  Oct 

2 

159 

Clear 

03-07 

340-110 

25  Oct 

1 

80 

Broken 

02-09 

050-100 

7  Nov 

3 

238 

Scattered 

00-08 

090-190 

18  Nov 

2 

159 

Broken 

00-06 

330-230 

56 


TABLE  6 
TIME  OF  BEGINNING  OF  MIGRATION  ON  VARIOUS  DAYS 


Da  t(3 

Sunrise 

Began 

Obs- 

ervation 

First 

Migrant 

(EST) 

Time  (EST) 

Temp .  ( 

OF.  ) 

Time  (EST) 

Temp .  ( OF . ) 

11  Oct 

63 

0630 

0700 

53 

0930 

64-69 

16  Oct 

63 

0632 

0800 

66 

0930 

70-73 

18  Oct 

63 

0634 

0800 

58 

0930 

65-72 

23  Sep 

64 

0617 

0800 

67 

0815 

67-75 

TABLE  7 

MIGRATION  DENSITIES  OBSERVED  AT  VARIOUS  TIMES  ON 
SEPTEMBER  23,  1964 


Number 
Time  (EST)    Crossing 
Circle 


Density 


0800-1000 

11 

874 

1000-1100 

11 

874 

1200-1300 

19 

1,510 

1300-1400 

12 

954 

1400-1500 

16 

1,272 

1600-1700 

11 

874 

57 
the  sex  ratio  is  essentially  1:1  in  the  total  population  of 
Aqraulis  vanillae ,  the  females  outnumber  the  males  among  the 
migrants.   Six  migrant  females  were  preserved  and  dissected. 
Of  these,  five  had  spermatophores  in  the  bursa.   Mature  eggs 
were  present  in  the  oviducts  of  three,  and  in  some,  the 
abdomen  was  partially  empty,  suggesting  that  they  had  already 
oviposited. 


ORIENTATION  EXPERIMENTS 


Introduction 


The  ability  to  maintain  a  constant  compass  direction 
by  referring  to  the  sun  and  compensating  for  its  apparent  move- 
ment was  first  demonstrated  in  bees  by  von  Frisch  (1950)  and 
in  birds  by  Kramer  (1950).   Since  that  time,  this  ability  has 
been  found  in  many  animals  including  fish  (Hasler,  Horrall , 
Wisby,  and  Braemer,  1958),  ajnphibians  (Ferguson,  1963),  reptiles 
(Gould,  1957),  and  arthropods  (Birukow,  1956;  Papi ,  1955;  Pardi 
and  Papi,  1952),  and  it  has  been  dealt  with  in  a  recent  sym- 
posium on  biological  clocks  (Long  Island  Biological  Association, 
1960)  and  in  a  more  recent  symposium  on  animal  orientation 
(Autrum,  1963).   An  animal  which  is  maintaining  a  constant 
course  by  means  of  this  time-compensated  sun  compass  changes 
its  angle  with  respect  to  the  sun  at  a  rate  which  is  equal  in 
magnitude  and  opposite  in  direction  to  the  angular  velocity  of 
the  sun.   This  mechanism  requires  a  clock  furnishing  the  exact 
local  time  and  a  knowledge  of  the  sun's  angular  velocity. 

The  internal  or  biological  clock  which  furnishes  the 
local  time  can  be  reset,  at  least  in  many  cases,  by  subjecting 
the  animals  to  a  light-dark  cycle  which  is  out  of  phase  with 
the  natural  cycle  (Birukow,  1960;  Braemer,  1960;  Hoffmann,  1960; 
Pardi  and  Grassi ,  1955;  Schmidt-Koenig ,  1960),  and  the  aonount  by 

58 


59 
which  the  phase  of  the  clock  is  shifted  depends  upon  the  magni- 
tude of  the  phase  shift  in  the  light-dark  cycle.   Animals  in 
which  the  phase  of  the  internal  clock  has  been  shifted  show  a 
corresponding  phase  shift  in  the  orientation  rhythm.   If,  for 
example,  an  animal  which  has  been  trained  under  the  natural 
sun  to  search  for  food  in  a  given  direction  is  subjected  for 
several  days  to  a  light-dark  cycle  in  which  the  light  period 
begins  and  ends  6  hours  later  than  in  the  natural  cycle,  it 
will  search  for  food  90  degrees  to  the  right  of  the  training 
direction  when  tested  again  under  the  natural  sun.   This 
phenomenon  provides  one  means  of  demonstrating  a  time-compen- 
sated sun  compass  in  an  orienting  animal. 

Frequently,  animals  which  are  orienting  by  means  of  a 
time-compensated  sun  compass  will  recognize  a  fixed  light 
source  as  the  sun  and  will  change  their  direction  during  the 
course  of  the  day  by  changing  their  angle  with  respect  to  this 
fixed  light  source  (Birukow,  1960;  Braemer,  1960;  Kramer,  1952), 
The  rate  of  change  of  this  angle  is  such  that  a  constant  direc- 
tion would  be  maintained  if  the  artificial  sun  were  moving  with 
the  angular  velocity  of  the  natural  sun.   This  phenomenon  pro- 
vides another  means  of  demonstrating  the  existence  of  a  time- 
compensated  sun  compass. 

Methods  and  Materials 

The  field  observations  suggested  that  the  orientation 
mechanism  underlying  the  unidirectional  migratory  flight  of  the 
gulf  fritillary  could  be  a  time-compensated  sun  compass,  so 


60 
two  series  of  experiments  were  performed  to  test  this  hypothesis. 
In  one  series,  orientation  tests  were  made  in  a  room  which  was 
completely  dark  except  for  the  light  provided  by  a  150  watt 
flood  light  serving  as  an  artificial  sun.   In  the  other  series, 
orientation  tests  were  made  on  the  roof  of  a  three  story  build- 
ing when  the  sun  was  clearly  visible.   The  butterflies  used  in 
these  tests  were  captured  between  September  30  and  November  7, 
1964,  at  the  site  used  for  observations  of  the  migration.   They 
were  taken  with  an  insect  net  while  in  flight  or  while  pausing 
to  feed  at  flowers. 

The  butterflies  were  tested  individually  in  an  octa- 
gonal cage  with  screen  sides  24  inches  wide  and  60.5  inches  high, 
a  screen  top,  and  a  plywood  floor  (Figure  23).   The  top  of  the 
cage  was  divided  into  eight  sectors  by  four  diameters.   The 
butterflies  were  introduced  into  the  cage  by  placing  them  under 
an  opaque  container  in  the  center  of  the  floor  and  then  raising 
the  container  to  the  top  by  means  of  a  string  extending  to  the 
outside.   After  the  container  was  raised,  they  usually  remained 
on  the  floor  for  a  short  time  and  then  flew  to  one  of  the  sides. 
Periods  of  rest,  when  the  butterflies  sat  motionless  with  the 
wings  held  over  the  back,  alternated  with  periods  of  activity 
consisting  of  opening  and  closing  the  wings  while  remaining 
stationary  or  while  walking,  and  of  flying  about  and  into  the 
sides  of  the  cage.   The  ratio  of  rest  to  activity  varied  con- 
siderably from  individual  to  individual  and  from  one  time  to 
another  in  the  same  individual.   Each  butterfly  was  scored  by 
recording  its  position  by  sector  every  10  seconds  during  periods 


61 


Figure  23.   Cage  used  for  orientation  tests. 


62 

of  flight  for  one  hour  beginning  at  the  time  the  container 
was  raised.   If  an  individual  was  not  scored  25  or  more  times 
during  the  first  half  hour,  it  was  considered  inactive,  and 
the  test  was  discontinued. 

In  the  artificial  sun  experiments,  the  light  was  directly 
opposite  the  center  of  one  sector.   In  the  outdoor  experiments, 
the  center  of  one  sector  was  aligned  with  true  north  so  that  each 
sector  represented  45  degrees  centered  about  one  of  the  points 
of  an  eight  point  compass.   The  scores  were  analyzed  using  a 
modification  of  the  method  outlined  by  Papi  and  Tongiorgi  (1963). 
The  direction  of  the  mean  vector,  0,  and  its  length,  r,  were 
calculated  from  the  distribution  of  n  scores  for  each  individual. 
The  sectors  were  numbered  clockwise  from  0-7  beginning  with  the 
position  of  the  light,  or  with  north.   The  direction  and  length 
of  the  mean  vector  are  given  by  the  expressions 

7 

"^T""         •   •    360° 
2_^   Hi  •  sin  1  •  ^2gH_ 

^    i  =  o 
tan  e  =  — and 

>  ,   n-  •  cos  i  •  ^^Q 
i  =  o  ^ 


^  (^z;^  „, .  s.n . .  3-)  .(x:^n. 


cos  1 


360°^ 


2 


r  - 


where  n^  is  the  number  of  scores  in  the  ith  sector.   The  direc- 
tion of  the  vector  is  expressed  in  degrees  measured  clockwise 
from  the  position  of  the  light,  or  from  north.   The  length  is  a 
measure  of  the  dispersion  of  the  scores  and  varies  from  1-0 
as  the  dispersion  increases.   In  the  present  study,  individuals 


63 
showing  values  of  r  less  than  0.7  were  considered  to  be  dis- 
oriented. 

Artificial  sun  experiments  were  performed  on  two 
migrants.   The  butterflies  were  confined  individually  in  cubic 
screen  cages  4  inches  on  a  side  and  kept  in  a  greenhouse  under 
the  natural  light-dark  cycle  until  they  were  tested.   Observa- 
tions were  made  for  one  hour  every  other  hour  between  0800  EST 
and  1700  EST  in  one  case  and  between  0900  EST  and  1600  EST  in 
the  other.   The  light  was  located  6  feet  south  of  the  center 
of  the  cage  at  a  height  of  6  feet.   Observations  were  made  from 
behind  the  light. 

Outdoor  experiments  were  conducted  between  October  18 
and  November  17,  1964,  at  Gainesville,  Florida.   Observations 
were  made  from  four  stations  about  3  feet  outside  the  cage,  one 
at  each  of  the  four  major  compass  directions,  and  each  station 
was  used  for  15  minutes  during  each  test.   The  butterflies  used 
in  these  experiments  were  treated  in  three  different  ways.   Be- 
tween tests,  the  first  group  was  kept  under  a  light-dark  cycle 
which  was  the  same  as  the  natural  cycle  at  the  time  of  year 
the  tests  were  made.   For  at  least  3  days  prior  to  testing  and 
between  tests,  the  second  group  was  subjected  to  a  light-dark 
cycle  in  which  the  light  period  began  and  ended  6  hours  later 
than  in  the  natural  cycle.   The  third  group  was  kept  under  the 
in-phase  cycle  until  one  or  more  tests  had  been  made,  then  sub- 
jected to  the  out-of-phase  cycle  for  at  least  3  days  and  tested 
again.   When  they  were  not  being  tested,  the  butterflies  were 
confined  in  cubic  screen  cages  4  inches  on  a  side.   They  were 
fed  once  a  day  as  described  previously. 


64 
The  desired  light-dark  cycles  were  maintained  in  con- 
trolled photoperiod  cabinets  in  which  the  temperature  was 
held  constant.   One  of  these  cabinets  is  illustrated  in  Figure 
24.   It  is  constructed  of  ^4  inch  plywood  on  a  frame  of  ^  x  3/4 
inch  wooden  strips  and  is  lined,  except  for  the  top,  with  ^ 
inch  cane-fiber  insulation  board  (Celotex).   The  dimensions  are 
26  X  22  X  3Ah   inches  on  the  outside  and  24^2  x  20^  x  33-3/4 
inches  on  the  inside.   Two  24  inch  base  fluorescent  fixtures 
are  fastened  inside  the  top  and  connected  to  a  time  switch 
(Sears,  Roebuck  and  Co.,  Model  number  5870)  on  the  outside. 
Lighting  is  provided  by  two  20  watt  daylight  fluorescent  bulbs, 
and  the  interior  of  the  cabinet  is  painted  white  to  obtain 
maximum  brightness.   The  cabinet  is  partitioned  by  two  panes 
of  double  strength  glass  supported  at  distances  of  11^4  and 
n\   inches  from  the  top  by  frames  of  %  x  3/4  inch  wooden 
strips.   Thus  the  cabinet  is  divided  into  a  chamber  containing 
the  lights,  a  dead  air  space  between  the  panes  of  glass,  and  a 
chamber  for  housing  the  butterflies.   The  purpose  of  the  dead 
air  space  is  to  keep  to  a  minimum  temperature  fluctuations 
in  the  housing  chamber  caused  by  the  light-dark  cycle.   Access 
to  the  housing  chamber  is  provided  by  a  12  inch  high  door 
across  the  entire  front  of  the  cabinet.   A  strip  of  h   inch 
plywood  ih   inches  wide  along  the  top  of  the  door  covers  the 
crack  between  the  door  and  the  front  of  the  cabinet  to  exclude 
light.   Both  cabinets  were  placed  in  a  constant  temperature 
room,  and  air  was  circulated  through  the  housing  chambers  by 
means  of  a  blower.   Air  entered  through  a  2  inch  diameter  hose 


65 


Figure  24.   Cutaway  view  of  controlled  photoperiod  cabinet 
used  in  clock  resetting  experiments.   (A)  time  switch,  (B) 
light  chamber,  (C)  dead  air  space,  (D)  air  inlet,  (E)  hous- 
ing chamber. 


66 
in  the  back  of  each  cabinet  and  left  through  a  2  inch  diameter 
hose  in  the  side.   Both  hoses  were  curved  to  exclude  light. 
The  temperature  in  the  cabinets  varied  from  24-25°  C.   This 
fluctuation  was  the  same  as  that  elsewhere  in  the  constant  tem- 
perature room  and  was  not  associated  with  the  light-dark  cycle. 

Results 

The  artificial  sun  experiments  failed  to  demonstrate 
the  existence  of  a  time-compensated  sun  compass.   The  test 
butterflies  directed  their  flight  activity  toward  the  light 
throughout  the  day.   The  overall  illumination  in  the  room  was 
rather  low,  and  it  is  possible  that  under  these  conditions, 
the  compass  orientation  is  replaced  by  a  simple  positive  photo- 
taxis.   Better  results  might  have  been  obtained  by  providing 
diffuse  light  in  addition  to  the  light  provided  by  the  artifi- 
cial sun. 

The  results  of  the  outdoor  tests  are  summarized  in 
Figures  25-39.   In  these  figures,  north  is  at  the  top,  and  the 
small  circle  represents  the  position  of  the  sun  at  the  mid- 
point of  the  test  period.   Each  small  dot  represents  a  single 
score,  the  solid  arrow  represents  the  direction  and  length  of 
the  mean  vector,  and  the  dashed  arrow  represents  the  subjective 
direction;  i.e. ,  the  direction  the  butterfly  would  be  flying  if 
it  were  maintaining  the  observed  angle  to  the  sun  6  hours  before 
the  time  of  testing.   In  many  cases,  the  butterfly  being  tested 
was  inactive,  and  in  nine  cases  it  was  active  but  disoriented. 
This  was  probably  the  result  of  the  repeated  handling  to  which 
the  insects  were  subjected. 


67 
Nine  butterflies  were  active  and  oriented  in  one  or  more 
tests.   When  an  individual  was  tested  before  being  subjected  to 
the  phase-shifted  cycle,  it  usually  flew  in  the  migratory  direc- 
tion whether  it  was  tested  in  the  morning  or  afternoon  (Figures 
27,  28,  29,  30,  33,    35).   In  one  case,  however,  the  orientation 
was  reversed  (Figures  25-26).   This  reversal  can  be  accounted 
for  if  the  model  proposed  by  Mittelstaedt  (1960)  for  the  control 
system  of  time-compensated  sun  orientation  is  accepted. 

Some  individuals  which  had  experienced  the  phase  shift 
flew  approximately  90  degrees  to  the  right  of  the  migratory 
direction  (Figures  36,  38,  39),  while  one  flew  approximately 
90  degrees  to  the  right  of  the  reversed  direction  (Figures 
31-32).   If  it  is  assumed  that  under  the  experimental  condi- 
tions, the  orientation  is  sometimes  turned  180  degrees,  as 
appears  to  be  the  case,  these  results  provide  good  evidence 
for  time-compensated  sun  orientation. 

In  the  case  of  Individuals  E  and  G  (Figures  34,  37), 
the  mean  vector  fell  in  the  northwest  quadrant  after  subjection 
to  the  phase  shift.   In  both  cases,  however,  there  appeared  to 
be  a  conflict  between  the  reversed  migratory  direction  and  the 
direction  imposed  by  the  phase  shift.   Individual  E  flew  to  the 
northeast  for  the  first  45  minutes  of  the  test  period  and  then 
to  the  northwest.   Individual  G  flew  to  the  northeast  for  the 
first  10  minutes  and  then  to  the  northwest.   No  explanation  for 
this  directional  conflict  is  immediately  apparent. 

The  results  of  these  experiments  suggest  that  the  mi- 
gratory direction  might  be  maintained  by  means  of  a  time- 


68 
compensated  sun  compass.   While  they  are  too  inconsistent  to 
be  conclusive,  they  are  suggestive  enough  to  warrant  further 
investigation  along  these  lines. 


69 


Figure  25.   Orientation  of  Individual  A  when  tested 
between  0930  and  1030  EST,  November  6,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   0  =  295.  degrees, 
r  =  0 . 844 .  ■ 


70 


Figure  26.   Orientation  of  Individual  A  when  tested 
between  1440  and  1540  EST,  November  6,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   0  =  296  degrees, 
t  =  0.902. 


71 


Figure  27.   Orientation  of  Individual  B  when  tested 
between  0950  and  1050  EST,  October  30,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   9  =  163  degrees,  r  =  0.919. 


72 


Figure  28.   Orientation  of  Individual  B  when  tested 
bet^veen  1410  and  1510  EST,  November  5,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   6  =  167  degrees, 
r  =  0.716, 


73 


Figure  29.   Orientation  of  Individual  C  when  tested 
between  1240  and  1340  EST,  November  5,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   0  =  156  degrees, 
r  =  0.825. 


74 


Figure  30.   Orientation  of  Individual  D  when  tested 
between  1510  and  1610  EST,  November  5,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   0  =  111  degrees, 
r  =  0.746. 


75 


Figure  31.   Orientation  of  Individual  D_ when  tested 
betiveen  1350  and  1450  EST,  November  10,"  1964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back'  6  hours  (5  days  in 
out-of -phase  cycle).   0  =  67  degrees,  r  =  0.853. 


76 


O 


Figure  32.   Orientation  of  Individual  D -when  tested 
between  1310  and  1410  EST,  November  11,  1964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (6  days  in 
out-rof-phase  cycle).   0  =  61  degrees,  r  =  0.801. 


77 


Figure  33.   Orientation  of  Individual  E  when  tested 
between  1030  and  1130  EST,  November  9,  1964,  ivi thou t 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   0  =  151  degrees,  r  =  0.904. 


78 


O 


Figure  34.   Orientation  of  Individual  "E  when  tested 
between  1240  and  1340  EST,  November  17,  1964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (8  days  in 
out-of-phase  cycle).   6  =  352  degrees,  r  =  0.700. 


79 


Figure  35.   Orientation  of  Individual  F  when  tested 
between  0930  and  1030  EST,  November  9,,  1964,  without 
resetting  the  internal  clock.   6  =  138  degrees, 
r  =  0.730. 


80 


Figure  36.   Orientation  of  Individual  F- when  tested 
between  1430  and  1530  EST,  November  16,  1964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (7  days  in 
out ,-of -phase  cycle).   9  =  218  degrees,  r  =  0.741. 


81 


Figure  37.   Orientation  of  Individual  G  when  tested 
between  1430  and  1530  EST,  October  18,  1964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (5  days  in  out- 
of -phase  cycle).   9  =  331  degrees,  r  =  0.743. 


82 


Figure  38.   Orientation  of  Individual  H  when  tested 
between  1530  and  1630  EST,  October  20,.  1-964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (3  days  in 
out- of- phase  cycle).   0  =  258  degrees,  r  =  0.903. 


83 


Figure  39.   Orientation  of  Individual  I  when  tested 
between  1430  and  1530  EST,  October  23,  1964,  after 
setting  the  internal  clock  back  6  hours  (4  days  in 
out- of- phase  cycle).   6  =  202  degrees,  r  =  0.807. 


DISCUSSION  AND  CONCLUSIONS 

Southwood  (1960)  presented  evidence  supporting  the 
hypothesis  that  in  the  course  of  evolution  a  low  level  of 
migratory  activity  has  been  associated  with  the  colonization 
of  permanent  habitats  and  a  high  level  closely  correlated 
with  the  adoption  of  temporary  ones.   The  prime  evolutionary 
advantage  of  migratory  movement  is  the  colonization  of  new 
habitats  and  of  previously  vacated  ones.   The  observations 
made  on  the  gulf  fritillary  during  the  course  of  this  study 
lend  additional  support  to  his  hypothesis. 

The  habitat  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior  is  temporary 
in  two  respects.   First,  its  relatively  small  and  widely 
scattered  breeding  areas  are  frequently  destroyed  by  the  feeding 
of  the  larvae  or  by  the  depredations  of  other  insects.   Second, 
winter  temperatures  are  too  low  for  its  survival  over  the 
greater  portion  of  its  range.   The  gulf  fritillary  is  essen- 
tially a  tropical  insect  and  probably  lacks  a  cold—  hardy 
stage  which  xvould  enable  it  to  overwinter  in  these  colder  areas. 
At  the  present  time,  no  precise  information  is  available  con- 
cerning the  cold-hardiness  of  the  various  stages  or  what  effect 
various  conditioning  factors  might  have  upon  this  cold- hardiness . 
Turner  (1963)  claimed  that  this  insect  overwintered  for  three 
consecutive  winters  in  west-central  Missouri.   He  based  this 

-   84 


85 
claim  on  the  fact  that  the  species  was  quite  abundant  on 
Passif lora  in  this  vicinity  during  three  successive  summers. 
This  idea  was  challenged  by  Howe  (1965)  who  pointed  out  that 
females  which  have  traveled  from  much  farther  south  reach  the 
latitude  of  Missouri  and  Kansas  during  June  and  July.   Ke 
also  reported  that  37  chrysalides  kept  outdoors  in  a  screen 
cage  during  late  October  in  Kansas  were  all  destroyed  during 
a  single  freezing  night. 

The  observations  made  during  the  course  of  the  research 
reported  here  suggest  that  the  species  is  not  able  to  pass  the 
winter  even  in  the  vicinity  of  Gainesville,  Florida.   If  the 
insect  successfully  ovenvintered  in  this  locality,  it  would 
probably  appear  in  substantial  numbers  with  the  return  of 
favorable  conditions.   Conditions  appear  to  be  favorable  for 
its  development  by  the  first  of  April,  but  at  this  time  of 
year  it  is  very  scarce  and  remains  so  until  midsummer.   This 
suggests  that  the  breeding  areas  in  this  part  of  the  state  are 
repopulated  by  females  arriving  from  farther  south. 

The  coastal  areas  of  southern  Florida  appear  to  be 
suitable  for  the  development  of  the  gulf  fritillary  throughout 
the  year.   These  localities  are  less  subject  to  frost  than  the 
inland  areas  due  to  the  moderating  influence  of  water.   During 
the  20  years  between  1937  and  1957,  less  than  25  hours  of  tem- 
peratures less  than  32°  F.  were  recorded  for  an  area  0-15  miles 
wide  running  along  the  coast  from  Palm  Beach  County  to  Lee 
County  (Federal-State  Frost  Warning  Service,  1958).   Further- 
more, field  observations  showed  that  both  the  larvae  and  the 


86 
food  plants  can  survive  brief  exposures  to  freezing  tempera- 
tures.  It  therefore  appears  very  likely  that  the  gulf  frit- 
illary  continues  to  breed  throughout  the  winter  in  these 
localities  and  possibly  in  other  warm  areas  along  the  Gulf 
Coast . 

At  least  some  individuals  leave  these  breeding  sites 
in  the  spring  and  move  northward.   Apparently  the  insect  is 
able  to  maintain  only  a  low  population  density  during  the 
winter,  as  the  northward  migration  is  much  sparser  than  the 
southward  one  and  is  too  thin  for  making  measurements  of  direc- 
tion and  density  by  means  of  the  technique  described  earlier. 
The  migrating  females  apparently  lay  eggs  enroute  as  patches 
of  the  food  plant  are  encountered  but  do  not  deposit  more  than 
a  few  eggs  in  any  one  locality  before  continuing  their  migra- 
tory flight.   This  movement  could  account  for  the  first 
appearance  of  eggs  and  larvae  in  the  vicinity  of  Gainesville, 
Florida,  about  the  first  of  April  and  for  the  appearance  of 
the  insect  as  far  north  as  Kansas  and  Missouri  in  June  or  July. 
Since  the  breeding  areas  are  widely  scattered,  only  a  few  of 
the  females  passing  through  a  given  latitude  will  encounter 
suitable  oviposition  sites  there.   Furthermore,  since  the 
butterflies  are  widely  separated  in  time  and  space,  we  would 
not  expect  all  the  available  breeding  sites  in  a  given  area 
to  be  occupied  at  the  same  time.   The  observations  made  in  the 
vicinity  of  Gainesville  show  that  this  is  the  case. 

It  appears  that  this  migration  continues  until  late 
summer  with  the  individuals  produced  in  a  given  locality 


87 
leaving  that  locality  and  moving  northward  as  did  their  female 
(and  perhaps  male)  parents.   This  seems  to  be  the  only  possible 
explanation  for  the  low  population  density  which  prevailed  at 
Gainesville  through  most  of  the  summer  in  spite  of  abundant 
food  and  favorable  weather.   No  evidence  was  found  which  sug- 
gests that  predators,  parasites,  or  disease  played  a  significant 
role  in  preventing  a  population  buildup. 

At  least  in  some  years,  the  insect  reaches  the  latitude 
of  New  York.   How  far  each  individual  travels  before  it  ceases 
its  migratory  flight  and  leaves  the  northward  expansion  of  the 
range  to  its  offspring  is  a  question  which  can  be  answered  only 
by  a  tagging  program  such  as  was  carried  out  on  the  monarch 
(Urquhart,  1960). 

Late  in  the  summer,  some  of  the  butterflies  begin  moving 
southward.   This  reversal  of  migratory  direction  perhaps  appears 
first  in  the  northernmost  segment  of  the  population  and  spreads 
southward  as  the  season  advances.   This  movement  results  in  the 
abandonment  of  the  greater  portion  of  the  range.   The  observa- 
tions made  at  Gainesville  suggest  that  not  all  individuals  take 
part  in  this  migration,  but  it  is  unlikely  that  the  descendents 
of  those  remaining  behind  survive  the  winter.   The  fact  that  at 
least  some  (and  probably  many)  of  the  migrant  females  have  mated, 
have  mature  eggs  in  their  ovaries,  and  have  partially  empty  ab- 
domens, strongly  suggests  that  they  oviposit  enroute.   The  sud- 
den increase  in  the  size  of  the  egg  and  larval  populations  in  the 
vicinity  of  Gainesville  late  in  the  summer  could  be  accounted  for 
by  the  passage  through  the  area  of  large  numbers  of  ovipositing 


88 


females  produced  in  the  large  northern  portion  of  the  range. 
The  estimates  of  migration  density  indicate  that  the  southward 
migration  was  already  at  or  beyond  its  peak  on  September  20, 
1964,  when  the  first  observation  was  made.   This  could  also 
account  for  the  sudden  occupancy  in  August  of  Area  4  by  large 
numbers  of  eggs  and  larvae  after  it  had  remained  empty  during 
most  of  the  summer.   The  fact  that  few  adults  were  ever  present 
in  the  breeding  areas  at  any  one  time  lends  further  support  to 
the  hypothesis  that  the  eggs  were  deposited  by  migrant  females. 
The  decline  of  the  populations  at  most  of  the  breeding  sites 
could  be  explained  by  the  destruction  of  food  plants,  but  it 
cannot  be  explained  in  this  manner  for  Area  3.   The  decrease  in 
all  the  populations  (except  in  Area  4)  is  probably  related  in 
part  to  a  decrease  in  the  migration  density. 

The  individuals  produced  from  many  of  the  eggs  deposited 
enroute  probably  reach  maturity  and  move  southward  themselves 
before  the  occurrence  of  freezing  temperatures.   Again,  the 
distance  traveled  by  each  individual  remains  to  be  determined 
by  a  tagging  program. 

The  flight  direction  of  the  fall  migrants  passing  through 
Gainesville,  Florida,  is  predominately  southeastward.   This  di- 
rection may  be  affected  somewhat  by  the  wind  but  is  not  deter- 
mined by  the  wind.   From  the  observations  presented  here,  it 
must  be  concluded  that  the  direction  of  the  displacement  of  the 
population  is  largely  under  the  control  of  the  insects  them- 
selves.  If  we  suppose,  as  is  probably  the  case,  that  the  flight 
continues  in  this  direction,  the  migrants  will  eventually  reach 


89 
the  coastal  areas  of  southern  Florida.   The  fact  that  A.  v. 

nigrior  does  not  intergrade  with  the  Bahaman  and  Antillian 

subspecies  A.  v-  insularis  strongly  suggests  that  the  migration 

does  not  extend  beyond  the  Florida  Keys. 

The  pattern  of  migratory  activity  described  here  is 
highly  adaptive.   The  northward  migration  in  the  spring  results 
in  the  colonization  of  new  habitats  and  prevents  extensive 
population  buildups  in  the  rather  small  breeding  areas  which 
would  result  in  food  shortage  and  an  increase  in  the  rate  of 
parasitism  and  disease.   The  northward  direction  has  a  dis- 
tinct evolutionary  advantage  in  that  the  insects  are  more  likely 
to  find  unoccupied  oviposition  sites  in  that  direction.   The 
descendents  of  those  individuals  ivhich  migrate  southward  in 
the  fall  survive  the  winter  and  repopulate  the  northern  breeding 
areas  the  following  summer.   The  descendents  of  those  which  do 
not  migrate  perish. 

Several  important  problems  concerning  the  migratory 
behavior  of  the  gulf  fritillary  remain  to  be  solved.   The 
orientation  experiments  described  here  indicate  that  a  time- 
compensated  sun  compass  may  be  the  mechanism  underlying  the 
oriented  flight,  but  the  results  were  too  inconsistent  to  prove 
this  definitely.   The  best  approach  to  this  problem  is  probably 
the  performance  of  artificial  sun  experiments  in  which  diffuse 
lighting  is  provided  in  addition  to  the  light  provided  by  the 
artificial  sun.   Experimental  work  is  needed  to  determine  what 
initiates  the  spring  and  fall  migrations  and  how  the  migratory 
direction  is  determined.   The  most  likely  initiating  factor 


90 
appears  to  be  either  temperature  or  photoperiod  or  a  combination 
of  the  two,  but  this  remains  to  be  proved.   Both  migratory  di- 
rections may  be  genetically  determined,  one  being  manifested 
under  one  set  of  conditions  and  the  other  under  another  set 
of  conditions,  or  the  direction  may  be  determined  in  another 
manner  as  it  is  in  the  great  southern  white  (Nielsen,  1961). 
Answers  to  all  of  these  questions  must  await  future  research. 


SUMMARY 

The  larvae  of  Agraulis  vanillae  nigrior  Michener  feed 
upon  Passif lora  incarnata  L.  and  probably  other  plants  of  the 
genus,  and  the  adults  oviposit  upon  and  in  the  vicinity  of 
these  plants.   The  insect  develops  very  rapidly,  reaching  the 
adult  stage  in  approximately  28  days  at  23-24°  C  and  in 
approximately  22  days  at  28.5-29.5°  C.   Most  adults  emerge 
from  the  chrysalides  during  the  morning.   The  females  usually 
reach  reproductive  maturity  12-18  hours  after  emergence,  and 
the  average  adult  life  span  is  about  18  days  under  laboratory 
conditions . 

The  adults  can  be  found  in  almost  any  open  situation, 
but  because  of  the  patchy  nature  of  the  food  plant  distribution, 
the  insect  can  breed  only  in  small  widely  scattered  areas.   The 
food  plants  in  these  small  areas  are  frequently  destroyed  by 
the  larvae  or  by  the  depredations  of  other  insects.   Winter 
temperatures  are  too  low  for  its  survival  over  the  greater 
portion  of  its  range,  but  it  is  probably  able  to  breed  through- 
out the  winter  in  the  coastal  areas  of  southern  Florida  and  in 
other  warn  areas  along  the  Gulf  Coast. 

The  insect  has  evolved  a  migratory  habit  which  has 
adapted  it  for  the  utilization  of  habitats  which  are  frequently 
rendered  unsuitable  for  its  survival  by  the  depletion  of  the 
food  supply  or  by  low  temperatures.   Observations  of  the  fall 

91 


92 

migration  and  of  fluctuations  in  egg  and  larval  populations  made 
at  Gainesville,  Florida,  suggest  that  there  is  a  northward  mi- 
gration which  continues  throughout  most  of  the  summer,  and 
that  the  females  oviposit  enroute.   Each  individual  apparently 
leaves  the  locality  in  which  it  emerges  to  participate  in  this 
movement.   Late  in  the  summer,  there  is  a  reversal  in  the  mi- 
gratory direction  which  results  in  at  least  a  partial  abandon- 
ment of  the  northern  portion  of  the  range. 

Observations  of  the  fall  migration  prove  that  the  mi- 
gratory direction  is  independent  of  topography,  time  of  day, 
and  wind  direction.   Experiments  conducted  to  demonstrate  that 
the  migrants  maintain  a  constant  course  by  referring  to  the 
sun  and  compensating  for  its  apparent  movement  were  incon- 
clusive but  were  suggestive  enough  to  warrant  further  investi- 
gations along  these  lines. 


LITERATURE  CITED 


Alexander,  A.  J.   1961a.   A  study  of  the  biology  and  behavior 
of  the  caterpillars,  pupae  and  emerging  butterflies  of 
the  subfamily  Heliconiinae  in  Trinidad,  West  Indies. 
Part  I.   Some  aspects  of  larval  behavior.   Zoologica. 
46:1-24. 

1961b.   A  study  of  the  biology  and  behavior  of  the 


caterpillars,  pupae  and  emerging  butterflies  of  the  sub- 
family Heliconiinae  in  Trinidad,  West  Indies.   Part  II. 
Molting,  and  the  behavior  of  pupae  and  emerging  adults. 
Zoologica.   46:105-124. 

Autrum,  H.,  ed.   1963.   Animal  Orientation.   Ergebnisse  der 
Biol.   26.   313  pp. 

Beebe,  W.,  J.  Crane,  and  H.  Fleming.   1960.   A  comparison  of 

eggs,  larvae  and  pupae  in  fourteen  species  of  heliconiine 
butterflies  from  Trinidad,  W.  I.   Zoologica.   45:111-154. 

Birukow,  G.  1956.  Lichtkompassorientierung  beim  Wasserlaufer 
^gl^^  currens  F.  (Heteroptera)  am  Tage  und  zur  Nachtzeit. 
I.  Herbs t-und  Winterversuche .   Z.  Tierpsych.   13:463-484. 

__   1960.   Innate  types  of  chronometry  in  insect  orienta- 
tion.  Cold  Spring  Harbor  Symposia  Quant.  Biol.   25:403- 
412. 

Braemer,  W.   1960.   A  critical  review  of  the  sun-azimuth 

hypothesis.   Cold  Spring  Harbor  Symposia  Quant.  Biol. 
25:413-427. 

Crane,  J.   1955.   Imaginal  behavior  of  a  Trinidad  butterfly, 
Heliconius  erato  hydara  Hewitson,  with  special  reference 
to  the  social  use  of  color.   Zoologica.   40:167-196. 

Edwards,  W.  H.   1880.   Description  of  prepatory  stages  of 

Agraulis  vanillae,  Linnaeus.   Canadian  Ent.   12:122-126. 

Emsley,  M.  1963.  A  morphological  study  of  imagine  Heliconiinae 
(Lep,:  Nymphalidae)  with  a  consideration  of  the  evolution- 
ary relationships  within  the  group.   Zoologica.   48:85-130. 


93 


94 

Federal-State  Frost  Warning  Service.   1958.   Winter  Minimum 
Temperatures  in  Peninsular  Florida.   Summary  of  20 
Seasons  1937-57.   Lakeland,  Florida. 

Ferguson,  D.  E.  1963.  Orientation  in  three  species  of  anuran 
amphibians.   Ergebnisse  der  Biol.   26:128-134. 

Fleming,  H.   1960.   The  first  ins  tar  larvae  of  the  Heliconiinae 
(butterflies)  of  Trinidad,  W.  I.   Zoologica.   45:91-110. 

von  Frisch,  K.   1950.   Die  Sonne  als  Kompass  im  Leben  der 
Bienen.   Experientia.   6:210-221. 

Gould,  E.   1957.   Orientation  in  box  turtles,  Terrapene  c. 
Carolina.   Biol.  Bull.   112:336-348. 

-  Hagen ,  K.  S.   1962.   Biology  and  ecology  of  predacious  Coc- 
cinellidae.   Ann.  Rev.  Ent.   7:289-326. 

Hasler,  A.  D. ,  R.  M.  Horrall,  W.  J.  Wisby,  and  W.  Braemer. 
1958.   Sun  orientation  and  homing  in  fishes.   Limnology 
and  Oceanography.   3:353-361. 

Hayward,  K.  J.   1962.   Migration  of  butterflies  and  a  moth  in 
Argentina,  spring  and  summer  1960-61.   Entomologist. 
95:8-12. 

Hoffmann,  K.  1960.  Experimental  manipulation  of  the  orienta- 
tional  clock  in  birds.  Cold  Spring  Harbor  Symposia  Quant. 
Biol.   25:379-387. 

Howe,  W.  H.   1965.   Status  of  Agraulis  vanillae  in  Missouri 
and  Kansas.   Jour.  Lepid.  Soc.   19:33-34. 

Killip,  E.  P.   1938.   The  American  species  of  Passif  loraceae .  '-' 

Kramer,  G.   1950.   Orientxerte  Zugaktivitat  gekafigter  Sing- 
vogel.   Naturwissenschaf ten .   37:188. 

1952.   Experiments  on  bird  orientation.   Ibis. 


94:265-285. 

Long  Island  Biological  Association.   1960.   Biological  Clocks. 
Cold  Spring  Harbor  Symposia  Quant.  Biol.   25.  524  pp. 

\J  Michener,  C.  D.   1942.   A  review  of  the  subspecies  of  Agraulis 
vanillae  (Linnaeus).   Lepidoptera:   Nymphalidae.   Amer. 
Mus .  Nov.  no.  1215.   7  pp. 

Mittelstaedt,  H.  z4dO.      Control  systems  of  orientation  in 
insects.   Ann.  Rev.  Ent.   7:177-198. 


95 

Nielsen,  E.  T.   1961.   On  the  habits  of  the  migratory  butterfly 
Ascia  monuste  L.   Biol.  Medd.  Dan.  Vid.  Selsk.   23:1-81. 

and  A.  T.  Nielsen.   1950.   Contributions  toward  the 


knowledge  of  the  migration  of  butterflies.   Amer.  Mus. 
Nov.  no.  1471.   29  pp. 

Papi ,  F.   1955.   Astronomische  Orientierung  bei  der  Wolfspinne, 

Arctosa  perita  (Latr.).   Z.  vergleich.  Physiol.   37:230- 

233. 
and  P.  Tongiorgi.   1963.   Innate  and  learned  components 

in  the  astronomical  orientation  of  wolf  spiders-   Ergeb- 

nisse  der  Biol.   26:259-280. 

Pardi ,  L.  and  M.  Grassi .   1955.   Experimental  modification  of 
direction-finding  in  Tali trus  saltator  (Montagu)  and 
Talorchastia  deshayesei  (Aud.)  (Crustacea-Amphipoda) . 
Experientia.  11:202-211. 

and  F.  Papi.   1952.   Die  Sonne  als  Kompass  bei 


Talitrus  saltator  (Montagu)  ( Amphipoda-Talitridae ) . 
Naturwissenschaf ten.   39:262-263. 

Provost,  M.  W.   1952.   The  dispersal  of  Aedes  taeniorhynchus . 
Mosquito  News.   12:174-190. 

1957.   The  dispersal  of  Aedes  taeniorhv"chus .   II. 


The  second  experiment.   Mosquito  News.   17:233-247. 

Rainey,  R.  C.  1951.  Weather  and  the  movements  of  locust 
swarms:   a  new  hypothesis.   Nature.   168:1057-1060. 

Schmidt-Koenig ,  K.   1960.   Internal  clocks  and  homing.   Cold 
Spring  Harbor  Symposia  Quant.  Biol.   25:389-393. 

Schneider,  F.   1962.   Dispersal  and  migration.   Ann.  Rev.  Ent. 
7:223-242. 

Scudder,  S.  H.   1889.   The  Butterflies  of  the  Eastern  United 
States  and  Canada  with  Special  Reference  to  New  England. 
Published  by  the  author,  Cambridge.   3  vols.,  1958  pp. 

Southwood,  T.  R.  E.   1960.   Migration  -  an  evolutionary 

necessity  for  denizens  of  temporary  habitats.   Proc . 
Intern.  Congr.  Ent.,  11th,  Vienna.   3:54-58. 

Turner,  R.  D.  1963.  Notes  on  the  occurrence  of  Agraulis 
vanillae  ( Nymphalidae )  in  the  midwest.  Jour.  Lepid. 
Soc.   17:227-228. 

United  States  Weather  Bureau.   1964.   Climatological  Data. 
Florida  Section.  68:157-174. 


96 

1965.   Climatological  Data.   Florida  Section.   69:1-14. 


Urquhart,  F.  A.   1960.   The  Monarch  Butterfly.   Univ.  of  Toronto 
Press,  Toronto.   361  pp. 

V\;illiams,  C.  B.   1957.   Insect  migration.   Ann.  Rev.  Ent. 
2:163-180. 

1958.   Insect  Migration.   The  New  Naturalist.   Collins, 


London.   235  pp. 


BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH 

Richard  Terrance  Arbogast  was  born  August  7,  1937,  at 
Freeport,  Illinois.   In  June,  1955,  he  graduated  from  Freeport 
High  School.   In  June,  1959,  he  received  the  degree  of  Bachelor 
of  Science  from  the  University  of  Illinois.   Mr.  Arbogast  en- 
tered the  United  States  Air  Force  in  1959,  and  after  receiving 
meteorological  training  at  the  University  of  Chicago,  he  served 
in  the  Air  Weather  Service  until  1962  and  was  stationed  in 
Arizona.   In  September,  1962,  he  v,ras  awarded  a  National  Defense 
Education  Act  Fellowship  for  study  in  entomology  at  the  Univer- 
sity of  Florida  and  until  the  present  time  he  pursued  his  work 
toward  the  degree  of  Doctor  of  Philosophy. 

Richard  Terrance  Arbogast  is  married  to  the  former 
Helen  Dee  Fortney  and  is  the  father  of  three  children.   He  is 
a  member  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America,  the  Florida 
Entomological  Society,  the  Lepidopteris ts '  Society,  Sigma  Xi , 
Phi  Sigma,  and  Alpha  Zeta. 


97 


This  dissertation  was  prepared  under  the  direction  of 
the  chairman  of  the  candidate's  supervisory  committee  and  has 
been  approved  by  all  members  of  that  committee.   It  was  sub- 
mitted to  the  Dean  of  the  College  of  Agriculture  and  to  the 
Graduate  Council,  and  was  approved  as  partial  fulfillment  of 
the  requirements  for  the  degree  of  Doctor  of  Philosophy. 

August  14,  1965 


^j/Uean^  College  of  Agriculture 


Dean,  Graduate  School 


Supervisory  Committee; 


1L^         (}.    \A/a  0^ 

Chai  rman  T 


Jv^ 


^,^/^^^r 


fflfOm. 


.a 


2242